145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30933705)
1. Adaptation to noise in amplitude modulation detection without the medial olivocochlear reflex.
Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Fumero MJ; Gorospe JM; Polo R; Gutiérrez Revilla A; Lopez-Poveda EA
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():133-141. PubMed ID: 30933705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modulation detection interference in cochlear implant listeners under forward masking conditions.
Chatterjee M; Kulkarni AM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):1117. PubMed ID: 29495705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Unrelated to the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 38(17):4138-4145. PubMed ID: 29593051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contralateral suppression of human hearing sensitivity in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Nogueira W; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lopez-Poveda E
Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():121-129. PubMed ID: 29941311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal Effects on Monaural Amplitude-Modulation Sensitivity in Ipsilateral, Contralateral and Bilateral Noise.
Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; López-Bascuas LE; Lopez-Poveda EA
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 19(2):147-161. PubMed ID: 29508100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased medial olivocochlear reflex strength in normal-hearing, noise-exposed humans.
Bhatt I
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184036. PubMed ID: 28886123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Formant frequency discrimination with a fine structure sound coding strategy for cochlear implants.
Liepins R; Kaider A; Honeder C; Auinger AB; Dahm V; Riss D; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2020 Jul; 392():107970. PubMed ID: 32339775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The middle ear muscle reflex in the diagnosis of cochlear neuropathy.
Valero MD; Hancock KE; Liberman MC
Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():29-38. PubMed ID: 26657094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli.
Hu H; Ewert SD; McAlpine D; Dietz M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1862. PubMed ID: 28372072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
Dieudonné B; Francart T
Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.
Zhou X; Li H; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan W
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S41-S48. PubMed ID: 27367147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sequential stream segregation with bilateral cochlear implants.
Wijetillake AA; van Hoesel RJM; Cowan R
Hear Res; 2019 Nov; 383():107812. PubMed ID: 31630083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
