145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30933705)
21. Perception of stochastic envelopes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
Gomersall PA; Turner RE; Baguley DM; Deeks JM; Gockel HE; Carlyon RP
Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():8-24. PubMed ID: 26706708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users.
Brochier T; McDermott HJ; McKay CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4097. PubMed ID: 28618807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changing stimulation patterns can change the broadness of contralateral masking functions for bilateral cochlear implant users.
Lee DH; Aronoff JM
Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():55-61. PubMed ID: 29548706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Rate modulation detection thresholds for cochlear implant users.
Brochier T; McKay C; McDermott H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):1214. PubMed ID: 29495682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant.
Plant K; Babic L
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 2():S31-8. PubMed ID: 26987051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus.
Paul BT; Bruce IC; Roberts LE
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():170-182. PubMed ID: 27888040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: Relationship to forward-masking recovery.
Zhou N; Pfingst BE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL70-5. PubMed ID: 27036290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spectral contrast enhancement improves speech intelligibility in noise for cochlear implants.
Nogueira W; Rode T; Büchner A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):728-39. PubMed ID: 26936556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Place specificity measured in forward and interleaved masking in cochlear implants.
Azadpour M; AlJasser A; McKay CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):EL314-20. PubMed ID: 24116536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spatial hearing in a child with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and bilateral cochlear implants.
Johnstone PM; Yeager KR; Noss E
Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):400-8. PubMed ID: 23586418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pulse-spreading harmonic complex as an alternative carrier for vocoder simulations of cochlear implants.
Mesnildrey Q; Hilkhuysen G; Macherey O
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):986-91. PubMed ID: 26936577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Medial olivocochlear reflex effects on amplitude growth functions of long- and short-latency components of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
Goodman SS; Boothalingam S; Lichtenhan JT
J Neurophysiol; 2021 May; 125(5):1938-1953. PubMed ID: 33625926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Human medial efferent activity elicited by dynamic versus static contralateral noises.
Mertes IB
Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():100-109. PubMed ID: 29793763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Desmond JM; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Aging of the medial olivocochlear reflex and associations with speech perception.
Abdala C; Dhar S; Ahmadi M; Luo P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Feb; 135(2):754-65. PubMed ID: 25234884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pupillometry Reveals That Context Benefit in Speech Perception Can Be Disrupted by Later-Occurring Sounds, Especially in Listeners With Cochlear Implants.
Winn MB; Moore AN
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518808962. PubMed ID: 30375282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
