These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30933708)

  • 1. Assessing emotional aspects of midwives' intrapartum care: Development of the emotional availability and responsiveness in intrapartum care scale.
    Leinweber J; Creedy DK; Rowe H; Gamble J
    Midwifery; 2019 Jul; 74():84-90. PubMed ID: 30933708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and Initial Psychometric Testing of the Midwifery Practice Climate Scale - Part 2.
    Thumm EB; Shaffer J; Meek P
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2020 Sep; 65(5):651-659. PubMed ID: 32893959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting midwives' confidence in intrapartum care: a phenomenological study.
    Bedwell C; McGowan L; Lavender T
    Midwifery; 2015 Jan; 31(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 25168008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing certified nurse-midwives' attitudes towards planned home birth.
    Vedam S; Aaker J; Stoll K
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 20189132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development, validation and reliability testing of 'Perinatal Bereavement Care Confidence Scale (PBCCS)'.
    Kalu FA; Larkin P; Coughlan B
    Women Birth; 2020 Jul; 33(4):e311-e319. PubMed ID: 31320295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Am I too emotional for this job?" An exploration of student midwives' experiences of coping with traumatic events in the labour ward.
    Coldridge L; Davies S
    Midwifery; 2017 Feb; 45():1-6. PubMed ID: 27936414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midwives' self-reported knowledge and skills to assess and promote maternal health literacy: A national cross-sectional survey.
    Creedy DK; Gamble J; Boorman R; Allen J
    Women Birth; 2021 Mar; 34(2):e188-e195. PubMed ID: 32113871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptation and psychometric testing of the Practice Environment Scale for use with midwives.
    Pallant JF; Dixon L; Sidebotham M; Fenwick J
    Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 26264165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Midwives' perspectives on (dis)respectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.
    Bradley S; McCourt C; Rayment J; Parmar D
    Reprod Health; 2019 Jul; 16(1):116. PubMed ID: 31345239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of the Midwife Profiling Questionnaire assessing women's preferred perinatal care professional and knowledge of midwives' legal competences.
    Vermeulen J; Peersman W; Quadvlieg L; Fobelets M; De Clercq G; Swinnen E; Beeckman K
    Sex Reprod Healthc; 2018 Jun; 16():23-32. PubMed ID: 29804771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Translation, adaptation and psychometric validation of the preterm birth experience and satisfaction scale (P-BESS) into Spanish.
    Alfaro Blazquez R; Ferrer Ferrandiz E; Pardo Moya S; Gea Caballero V; Corchon S
    Midwifery; 2018 Nov; 66():148-154. PubMed ID: 30172992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-cultural validation and psychometrics' evaluation of women's experience of maternity care scale in French: the ESEM.
    Floris L; de Labrusse C
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):188. PubMed ID: 32652954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
    Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Translation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the Emotional Labour Scale for nurses.
    Yao Y; Wei W; Hu Y; Zhang Y; Chen M
    J Nurs Manag; 2020 May; 28(4):948-958. PubMed ID: 32286718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth.
    Gungor I; Beji NK
    Midwifery; 2012 Jun; 28(3):348-57. PubMed ID: 21546142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A qualitative study of volunteer doulas working alongside midwives at births in England: Mothers' and doulas' experiences.
    McLeish J; Redshaw M
    Midwifery; 2018 Jan; 56():53-60. PubMed ID: 29078074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A qualitative study of factors that influence midwives' practice in relation to low-risk women's oral intake in labour in Australia.
    Tadaumi M; Sweet L; Graham K
    Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):e455-e463. PubMed ID: 31796342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a scale to evaluate midwives' beliefs about assessing alcohol use during pregnancy.
    Watkins RE; Payne JM; Reibel T; Jones HM; Wilkins A; Mutch R; Bower C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():353. PubMed ID: 26715154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring the quality and quantity of professional intrapartum support: testing a computerised systematic observation tool in the clinical setting.
    Ross-Davie MC; Cheyne H; Niven C
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Aug; 13():163. PubMed ID: 23945049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Satisfaction and continuity of care: staff views of care in a midwife-managed delivery unit.
    Hundley VA; Cruickshank FM; Milne JM; Glazener CM; Lang GD; Turner M; Blyth D; Mollison J
    Midwifery; 1995 Dec; 11(4):163-73. PubMed ID: 8569517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.