These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30933812)

  • 21. The recovery of waste and off-gas in Large Combustion Plants subject to IPPC National Permit in Italy.
    Di Marco G; Manuzzi R
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():313-321. PubMed ID: 28818398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Life cycle assessment of fuel selection for power generation in Taiwan.
    Yang YH; Lin SJ; Lewis C
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Nov; 57(11):1387-95. PubMed ID: 18069462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Energy needs versus environmental pollution: a reconciliation?
    Green L
    Science; 1967 Jun; 156(3781):1448-50. PubMed ID: 5611018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identification of waste management strategies and waste generation factors for thermal power plant sector wastes in Turkey.
    Demir C; Yetiş Ü; Ünlü K
    Waste Manag Res; 2019 Mar; 37(3):210-218. PubMed ID: 30355270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Control of mercury emissions from stationary coal combustion sources in China: Current status and recommendations.
    Hu Y; Cheng H
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Nov; 218():1209-1221. PubMed ID: 27596303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Electricity generation: options for reduction in carbon emissions.
    Whittington HW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Aug; 360(1797):1653-68. PubMed ID: 12460490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Enrichment of naturally occurring radionuclides and trace elements in Yatagan and Yenikoy coal-fired thermal power plants, Turkey.
    Ozden B; Guler E; Vaasma T; Horvath M; Kiisk M; Kovacs T
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Aug; 188():100-107. PubMed ID: 28965987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Processing and properties of a solid energy fuel from municipal solid waste (MSW) and recycled plastics.
    Gug J; Cacciola D; Sobkowicz MJ
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():283-92. PubMed ID: 25453320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nitrogen oxides, sulfur trioxide, and mercury emissions during oxy-fuel fluidized bed combustion of Victorian brown coal.
    Roy B; Chen L; Bhattacharya S
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14844-50. PubMed ID: 25402169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of the US EPA's determination of the role for CO2 capture and storage in new fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Clark VR; Herzog HJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7723-9. PubMed ID: 24960207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Shea meal and cotton stalk as potential fuels for co-combustion with coal.
    Munir S; Nimmo W; Gibbs BM
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Oct; 101(19):7614-23. PubMed ID: 20483598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comprehensive evaluation of the influence of air combustion and oxy-fuel combustion flue gas constituents on Hg(0) re-emission in WFGD systems.
    Ochoa-González R; Díaz-Somoano M; Martínez-Tarazona MR
    J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 276():157-63. PubMed ID: 24887118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Lake-sediment record of PAH, mercury, and fly-ash particle deposition near coal-fired power plants in Central Alberta, Canada.
    Barst BD; Ahad JME; Rose NL; Jautzy JJ; Drevnick PE; Gammon PR; Sanei H; Savard MM
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 1):644-653. PubMed ID: 28846985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Water-carbon trade-off in China's coal power industry.
    Zhang C; Anadon LD; Mo H; Zhao Z; Liu Z
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(19):11082-9. PubMed ID: 25215622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of multimode gas-fired combined-cycle chemical-looping combustion-based power plant layouts.
    Jayadevappa BR
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(36):54967-54987. PubMed ID: 35307797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Environmental impact of coal industry and thermal power plants in India.
    Mishra UC
    J Environ Radioact; 2004; 72(1-2):35-40. PubMed ID: 15162853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The impact of three recent coal-fired power plant closings on Pittsburgh air quality: A natural experiment.
    Russell MC; Belle JH; Liu Y
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Jan; 67(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 27027572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Water impacts of CO2 emission performance standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants.
    Talati S; Zhai H; Morgan MG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Oct; 48(20):11769-76. PubMed ID: 25229670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An integrated appraisal of energy recovery options in the United Kingdom using solid recovered fuel derived from municipal solid waste.
    Garg A; Smith R; Hill D; Longhurst PJ; Pollard SJ; Simms NJ
    Waste Manag; 2009 Aug; 29(8):2289-97. PubMed ID: 19443201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Co-combustion of solid recovered fuels in coal-fired power plants.
    Thiel S; Thomé-Kozmiensky KJ
    Waste Manag Res; 2012 Apr; 30(4):392-403. PubMed ID: 22143900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.