192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30933869)
1. Children's suffix effects for verbal working memory reflect phonological coding and perceptual grouping.
Lowenstein JH; Cribb C; Shell P; Yuan Y; Nittrouer S
J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Jul; 183():276-294. PubMed ID: 30933869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modalities of memory: is reading lips like hearing voices?
Maidment DW; Macken B; Jones DM
Cognition; 2013 Dec; 129(3):471-93. PubMed ID: 24041834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perceptual organization and precategorical acoustic storage.
Frankish C
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 May; 15(3):469-479. PubMed ID: 2524546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech.
Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-categorical processing and attenuation of the auditory suffix: evidence from both immediate and delayed suffixes.
Miles C; Westley DP; Buller MJ
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Sep; 89(3):261-82. PubMed ID: 7572269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ineluctable modality of the audible: perceptual determinants of auditory verbal short-term memory.
Maidment DW; Macken WJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):989-97. PubMed ID: 22468724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The modality effect and echoic persistence.
Watkins OC; Watkins MJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Sep; 109(3):251-78. PubMed ID: 6447188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Serial recall of two-voice lists: implications for theories of auditory recency and suffix effects.
Greene RL
Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 2017031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recency and suffix effects in serial recall of musical stimuli.
Greene RL; Samuel AG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Oct; 12(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 2945898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
Larsen JD; Baddeley A
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
Hanley JR; Hayes A
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.
Leist L; Lachmann T; Schlittmeier SJ; Georgi M; Klatte M
Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):307-320. PubMed ID: 36190658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Echoic and retrieval accounts of the long-term modality effect tested using the suffix procedure.
Huang ST; Glenberg AM
Am J Psychol; 1986; 99(4):453-70. PubMed ID: 3812815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
Hanley JR; Shah N
Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Executive and perceptual attention play different roles in visual working memory: evidence from suffix and strategy effects.
Hu Y; Hitch GJ; Baddeley AD; Zhang M; Allen RJ
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1665-1678. PubMed ID: 24933616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interactions Between Item Set and Vocoding in Serial Recall.
Bosen AK; Luckasen MC
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1404-1417. PubMed ID: 31033634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Capturing the suffix: cognitive streaming in immediate serial recall.
Nicholls AP; Jones DM
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jan; 28(1):12-28. PubMed ID: 11827075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suffix effects and intrusion errors in young and elderly subjects.
Greenhut-Wertz J; Manning SK
Exp Aging Res; 1995; 21(2):173-90. PubMed ID: 7628510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
