BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

880 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30934031)

  • 1. Mechanical stability of zirconia meso-abutments bonded to titanium bases restored with different monolithic all-ceramic crowns.
    Pitta J; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Boldt J; Gierthmuehlen PC; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1091–1097. PubMed ID: 30934031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical stability and technical outcomes of monolithic CAD/CAM fabricated abutment-crowns supported by titanium bases: An in vitro study.
    Pitta J; Hjerppe J; Burkhardt F; Fehmer V; Mojon P; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Feb; 32(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 33258267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
    Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
    Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture Resistance of Titanium, Zirconia, and Ceramic-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Implant Abutments Supporting CAD/CAM Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns After Aging.
    Atsü SS; Aksan ME; Bulut AC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):622–630. PubMed ID: 30716141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
    Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Failure Load of Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Single Crowns Bonded to Ti-base Abutments versus to Customized Ceramic Abutments after Fatigue.
    Spitznagel FA; Bonfante EA; Vollmer F; Gierthmuehlen PC
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):136-146. PubMed ID: 33870577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fracture resistance of crowns cemented on titanium and zirconia implant abutments: a comparison of monolithic versus manually veneered all-ceramic systems.
    Martínez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Özcan M; Bartolomé JF; Pradíes G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1448-55. PubMed ID: 23189296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
    Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical Stability of Restorations Supported by Titanium Base, Zirconia, and Polyetherketoneketone Abutments on One- and Two-Piece Zirconia Implants.
    Cantarella J; Pitta J; Mojon P; Hicklin SP; Fehmer V; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):313-321. PubMed ID: 33909721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stiffness, strength, and failure modes of implant-supported monolithic lithium disilicate crowns: influence of titanium and zirconia abutments.
    Joda T; Bürki A; Bethge S; Brägger U; Zysset P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1272-9. PubMed ID: 26574852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fatigue and Stress Distribution Analyses of Ceramic-Reinforced PEEK Abutments Restored with Monolithic Zirconia Crowns as an Alternative to Conventional Esthetic Abutments.
    Akan E; Velioğlu E; Çömlekoğlu ME; Çömlekoğlu MD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):533-542. PubMed ID: 35727245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the fracture resistance and failure types of different CAD-CAM ceramic crowns supported by angled titanium abutments.
    Yüksel M; Saygin AG; Bolayir G
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Aug; 32(7):594-601. PubMed ID: 36065985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of Different CAD/CAM Crown Materials on the Fracture of Custom-Made Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments After Artificial Aging.
    Elsayed A; Farrag G; Chaar MS; Abdelnabi N; Kern M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(1):91-96. PubMed ID: 30677119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bending moments and types of failure of zirconia and titanium abutments with internal implant-abutment connections: a laboratory study.
    Leutert CR; Stawarczyk B; Truninger TC; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):505-12. PubMed ID: 22616042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of metal opaquer on the final color of 3 ceramic crown types on 3 abutment configurations.
    Arif R; Yilmaz B; Mortazavi A; Ozcelik TB; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):375-381. PubMed ID: 29724553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
    Martinez-Rus F; Ferreiroa A; Ozcan M; Pradies G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical behavior of posterior all-ceramic hybrid-abutment-crowns versus hybrid-abutments with separate crowns-A laboratory study.
    Nouh I; Kern M; Sabet AE; Aboelfadl AK; Hamdy AM; Chaar MS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jan; 30(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 30521070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
    Taha D; Sabet A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro study of the influence of the type of connection on the fracture load of zirconia abutments with internal and external implant-abutment connections.
    Sailer I; Sailer T; Stawarczyk B; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):850-8. PubMed ID: 19865625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.