406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30934038)
1. Axial displacement in cement-retained prostheses with different implant-abutment connections.
Ko KH; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1098–1104. PubMed ID: 30934038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision of the Connection Between Implant and Standard or Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Abutments: A Novel Evaluation Method.
Lops D; Meneghello R; Sbricoli L; Savio G; Bressan E; Stellini E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 29340342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical stability of fully personalized, abutment-free zirconia implant crowns on a novel implant-crown interface.
Hjerppe J; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH; Özcan M; Mühlemann S
J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104121. PubMed ID: 35395344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Displacement comparison of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments to implants with different conical connections.
Yilmaz B; Hashemzadeh S; Seidt JD; Clelland NL
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Apr; 62(2):200-203. PubMed ID: 28888428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characteristics of implant-CAD/CAM abutment connections of two different internal connection systems.
Sumi T; Braian M; Shimada A; Shibata N; Takeshita K; Vandeweghe S; Coelho PG; Wennerberg A; Jimbo R
J Oral Rehabil; 2012 May; 39(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 22175784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of materials on axial displacement and internal discrepancy of cement-retained implant-supported prostheses.
Ko KH; Huh YH; Park CJ; Cho LR
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):462-469. PubMed ID: 33309295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study.
Yilmaz B; Çakmak G; Batak B; Johnston WM
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2021 Jun; 23(3):373-379. PubMed ID: 33938119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fracture resistance of titanium and zirconia abutments: an in vitro study.
Foong JK; Judge RB; Palamara JE; Swain MV
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 23684280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of reliability of CAD-CAM tooth-colored implant custom abutments.
Guilherme NM; Chung KH; Flinn BD; Zheng C; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 26948082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of CAD/CAM abutment and prefabricated abutment in Morse taper internal type implant after cyclic loading: Axial displacement, removal torque, and tensile removal force.
Yi Y; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
J Adv Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 11(6):305-312. PubMed ID: 31897269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dental implant-abutment fracture resistance and wear induced by single-unit screw-retained CAD components fabricated by four CAM methods after mechanical cycling.
Markarian RA; Galles DP; França FMG
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 33640089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro assessment of three types of zirconia implant abutments under static load.
Kim JS; Raigrodski AJ; Flinn BD; Rubenstein JE; Chung KH; Mancl LA
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 23566607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fracture strength of zirconia implant abutments on narrow diameter implants with internal and external implant abutment connections: A study on the titanium resin base concept.
Sailer I; Asgeirsson AG; Thoma DS; Fehmer V; Aspelund T; Özcan M; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Apr; 29(4):411-423. PubMed ID: 29527740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Displacement and performance of abutments in narrow-diameter implants with different internal connections.
Jacobs N; Seghi R; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jan; 127(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 33413986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bending moments of zirconia and titanium implant abutments supporting all-ceramic crowns after aging.
Mühlemann S; Truninger TC; Stawarczyk B; Hämmerle CH; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 23735182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis of the Adaptation of Single-Unit Screw-Retained Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture Abutments After Mechanical Cycling.
Markarian RA; Galles DP; Gomes França FM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):127–136. PubMed ID: 28632256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence of undetected cement on CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia crowns and customized CAD/CAM implant abutments. A prospective case series.
Wasiluk G; Chomik E; Gehrke P; Pietruska M; Skurska A; Pietruski J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Jul; 28(7):774-778. PubMed ID: 27188407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
