These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30936537)

  • 1. Election polling errors across time and space.
    Jennings W; Wlezien C
    Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 2(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 30936537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social media popularity and election results: A study of the 2016 Taiwanese general election.
    Zhang X
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0208190. PubMed ID: 30485347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating Pre-election Polling Estimates Using a New Measure of Non-ignorable Selection Bias.
    West BT; Andridge RR
    Public Opin Q; 2023; 87(Suppl 1):575-601. PubMed ID: 37705923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Data from the GIPEyOP online election poll for the 2015 Spanish General election.
    Pavía JM; Coll-Serrano V; Cuñat-Giménez R; Carrasco-Arroyo S
    Data Brief; 2020 Aug; 31():105719. PubMed ID: 32490084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.
    Gao M; Wang Z; Wang K; Liu C; Tang S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270194. PubMed ID: 35771877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Polls, the Election, and Public Health Research: Reaching the Hard to Reach.
    van Lenthe FJ
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Feb; 107(2):237-238. PubMed ID: 28075649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Voters and the Affordable Care Act in the 2014 election.
    Blendon RJ; Benson JM
    N Engl J Med; 2014 Nov; 371(20):e31. PubMed ID: 25353968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A meta-analysis of the 2004 campaign polls: an analogy to practice and publication in psychology.
    Collings RD; Eaton LG; Hendrickson M
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Jun; 100(3 Pt 1):847-56. PubMed ID: 17688104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Chang KC; Chiang CF; Lin MJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0253560. PubMed ID: 34851951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring relative opinion from location-based social media: A case study of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Gong Z; Cai T; Thill JC; Hale S; Graham M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233660. PubMed ID: 32442212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How the polls can be both spot on and dead wrong: using choice blindness to shift political attitudes and voter intentions.
    Hall L; Strandberg T; Pärnamets P; Lind A; Tärning B; Johansson P
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60554. PubMed ID: 23593244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voters and health care in the 2004 election.
    Blendon RJ; Brodie M; Altman DE; Benson JM; Hamel EC
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; Suppl Web Exclusives():W5-86-W5-96. PubMed ID: 15741610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health care in the 2004 presidential election.
    Blendon RJ; Altman DE; Benson JM; Brodie M
    N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1314-22. PubMed ID: 15385658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Candidate preferences and expectations of election outcomes.
    Delavande A; Manski CF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Mar; 109(10):3711-5. PubMed ID: 22355121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of Twitter opinion trends with national polling aggregates: Hillary Clinton vs Donald Trump.
    Bovet A; Morone F; Makse HA
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):8673. PubMed ID: 29875364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing for voter rigging in small polling stations.
    Jimenez R; Hidalgo M; Klimek P
    Sci Adv; 2017 Jun; 3(6):e1602363. PubMed ID: 28695193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using public opinion to serve journalistic narratives: Rethinking vox pops and live two-way reporting in five UK election campaigns (2009-2017).
    Cushion S
    Eur J Commun; 2018 Dec; 33(6):639-656. PubMed ID: 30587881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The political use of poll results about public support for a privatized healthcare system in Canada.
    Contandriopoulos D; Bilodeau H
    Health Policy; 2009 Apr; 90(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 18835651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical detection of systematic election irregularities.
    Klimek P; Yegorov Y; Hanel R; Thurner S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(41):16469-73. PubMed ID: 23010929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infections and Elections: Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections (and if so, How)?
    Beall AT; Hofer MK; Schaller M
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):595-605. PubMed ID: 26976083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.