These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30937332)

  • 1. Influence of Age on Perception of Best Esthetical Profile.
    Salehi P; Azadeh N; Beigi N; Farzin M
    J Dent (Shiraz); 2019 Mar; 20(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 30937332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Antero-Posterior Lip Position in Most Favored Facial Profile of Jaipur Population.
    Sharma K; Trehan M; Singh S; Mahlawat H; Kenkare P; Jayavarma S A
    Cureus; 2022 Aug; 14(8):e27774. PubMed ID: 36106287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of anteroposterior lip positions in the most-favored Iranian facial profiles using silhouette.
    Sodagar A; Borujeni DG
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Sep; 10(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 24910646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of forehead and neck position on esthetics of class I, II and III profiles.
    Salehi P; Oshagh M; Aleyasin ZS; Pakshir HR
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):412-25. PubMed ID: 25126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Comparison of Esthetic Preferences on Female Skeletal Class II Alterations among Laypeople of Different Facial Profiles.
    Tipyanggul W; Changsiripun C; Chamnannidiadha N
    Eur J Dent; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39074835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Facial attractiveness of skeletal class I and class II malocclusion as perceived by laypeople, patients and clinicians.
    Pace M; Cioffi I; D'antò V; Valletta A; Valletta R; Amato M
    Minerva Stomatol; 2018 Jun; 67(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 29308854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What Is the Perception of an Esthetic Lower Facial Third Profile in the Korean Layperson Population?
    Kim JY; Ku JK; Lee S; Huh JK; Han MD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 May; 80(5):838-849. PubMed ID: 35033506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial profile preferences, self-awareness and perception among groups of people in the United Arab Emirates.
    Al Taki A; Guidoum A
    J Orthod Sci; 2014 Apr; 3(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 24987664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of facial convexity on facial attractiveness in Japanese.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):181-6. PubMed ID: 17973684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Investigation on facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients].
    Wang YY; Guo CC; Zhou C; Fan ML; Wang WC; Bao BC
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2012 Dec; 21(6):668-72. PubMed ID: 23364553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Esthetic perceptions of facial silhouettes after treatment with a mandibular protraction appliance.
    Molina de Paula EC; de Castro Ferreira Conti AC; Siqueira DF; Valarelli DP; de Almeida-Pedrin RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Feb; 151(2):311-316. PubMed ID: 28153160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Esthetic perception of facial profile after treatment with the Thurow Appliance.
    Pithon MM; Lacerda-Santos R; Oliveira DL; Alves JV; Britto JP; Souza Eda S; Alves LP; Barbosa G; Coqueiro Rda S; Santos AF
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of African American profile esthetics.
    Hockley A; Weinstein M; Borislow AJ; Braitman LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 22284283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differences in facial profile and dental esthetic perceptions between young adults and orthodontists.
    Yin L; Jiang M; Chen W; Smales RJ; Wang Q; Tang L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jun; 145(6):750-6. PubMed ID: 24880845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of chin prominence on anterior-posterior lip positions of facial profile].
    Su YY; Wang CL; Liu DX; Dong RP; Li H
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Dec; 17(6):598-602. PubMed ID: 19148446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles.
    Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of esthetics perception and satisfaction of facial profile among male adolescents and adults with different profiles.
    Eslami N; Omidkhoda M; Shafaee H; Mozhdehifard M
    J Orthod Sci; 2016; 5(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 27127750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Photos vs silhouettes for evaluation of profile esthetics between white and black evaluators.
    Pithon MM; Silva IS; Almeida IO; Nery MS; de Souza ML; Barbosa G; Dos Santos AF; da Silva Coqueiro R
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 23957665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the Influence of Nasolabial Angle, Upper Sulcus Depth, and Nasal Tip Protrusion in the Perception of Facial Attractiveness.
    Jha N; Bamal R; Khairwa MK; Kalawat A; Yadav L; Sharma S
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S329-S334. PubMed ID: 38595513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontists and lay people rate masculine soft tissue profiles similarly but feminine soft tissue profiles differently.
    Einy S; Miri T; Katzhendler E; Aizenbud D; Emanuela K; Zaslansky P
    Quintessence Int; 2021; 52(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32954390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.