276 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30937859)
1. Systematic review of the outcome of cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty following pelvic irradiation.
Walters S; Prasad A; Guevel B; Sarraf KM; Achan P; Dawson-Bowling S; Millington S; Hanna SA
Musculoskelet Surg; 2019 Dec; 103(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30937859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
Kubinec V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [A comparative study on short-term effectiveness between cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of femoral head after renal transplantation].
Yu L; Qi C; Yu T; Meng Q; Zhao X; Liu K; Cai Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 27(12):1409-13. PubMed ID: 24640354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved survival of uncemented versus cemented femoral stems in patients aged < 70 years in a community total joint registry.
Wechter J; Comfort TK; Tatman P; Mehle S; Gioe TJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2013 Nov; 471(11):3588-95. PubMed ID: 23873609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Hailer NP; Garellick G; Kärrholm J
Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 20180715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Tyson Y; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Mohaddes M
Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 31154890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cemented or uncemented acetabular fixation in combination with the Exeter Universal cemented stem.
Gwynne-Jones DP; Gray AR
Bone Joint J; 2020 Apr; 102-B(4):414-422. PubMed ID: 32228075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Dale H; Børsheim S; Kristensen TB; Fenstad AM; Gjertsen JE; Hallan G; Lie SA; Furnes O
Acta Orthop; 2020 Feb; 91(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 31663413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of cemented acetabular component geometry on the risk of revision for instability or loosening : a study of 224,874 primary hip arthroplasties from the National Joint Registry.
Divecha HM; O'Neill TW; Lunt M; Board TN
Bone Joint J; 2021 Nov; 103-B(11):1669-1677. PubMed ID: 34719277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early postoperative mortality similar between cemented and uncemented hip arthroplasty: a register study based on Finnish national data.
Ekman E; Palomäki A; Laaksonen I; Peltola M; Häkkinen U; Mäkelä K
Acta Orthop; 2019 Feb; 90(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 30712498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing modern uncemented, hybrid and cemented implant combinations in older patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty, a New Zealand Joint Registry study.
Boyle AB; Zhu M; Frampton C; Poutawera V; Vane A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2023 Jun; 143(6):3597-3604. PubMed ID: 36102955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Meta-Analysis of Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty Recipients Following Pelvic Irradiation.
Novikov D; Cohen D; Swanson D; Vojdani S; Khan F
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1546-1552. PubMed ID: 30904364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Etiology, diagnosis and therapy of aseptic hip prosthesis loosening--a status assessment].
Wirtz DC; Niethard FU
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1997; 135(4):270-80. PubMed ID: 9381761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Epidemiology of periprosthetic femoral fractures in 5417 revision total hip arthroplasties: a 40-year experience.
Abdel MP; Houdek MT; Watts CD; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
Bone Joint J; 2016 Apr; 98-B(4):468-74. PubMed ID: 27037428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Excellent Long-Term Survival Rate of Polished, Tapered, Cemented Stems in Patients Aged 35 Years or Younger With Avascular Necrosis or Inflammatory Arthritis of the Hip.
Vanstockstraeten S; Ghijselings S; Vles GF; Simon JP
J Arthroplasty; 2022 May; 37(5):897-904.e1. PubMed ID: 35093544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications.
Morison Z; Moojen DJ; Nauth A; Hall J; McKee MD; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):392-8. PubMed ID: 26335343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
