240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30937942)
1. Evaluation of the Performance of the Ultrasound (US) Elastographic Q-Analysis Score Combined With the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for Malignancy Risk Stratification in Prostate Nodules Based on Transrectal US-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Imaging.
Ding Z; Ye X; Zhang L; Sun Y; Ni Z; Liu H; Xu J; Dong F
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Nov; 38(11):2991-2998. PubMed ID: 30937942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of elastographic Q-analysis score combined with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) based on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)/multi-parameter magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) fusion-guided biopsy in differentiating benign and malignant prostate.
Tian H; Ding Z; Wu H; Yang K; Song D; Xu J; Dong F
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Jul; 12(7):3569-3579. PubMed ID: 35782253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Value of the Elastographic Q-Analysis Score in Assisting Real-Time Elastography-Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Retrospective Study of 125 Patients.
Ding Z; Jiao Y; Wu H; Zhang L; Song H; Ni Z; Ye X; Xu J; Dong F
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jan; 39(1):83-87. PubMed ID: 31264233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Aneja S; Syed JS; Pahade J; Mathur M; Sprenkle P; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):W218-W225. PubMed ID: 29489409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive clinical features for negative histopathology of MRI/Ultrasound-fusion-guided prostate biopsy in patients with high likelihood of cancer at prostate MRI: Analysis from a urologic outpatient clinic1.
Apfelbeck M; Pfitzinger P; Bischoff R; Rath L; Buchner A; Mumm JN; Schlenker B; Stief CG; Chaloupka M; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 76(4):503-511. PubMed ID: 33337358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?
Xu N; Wu YP; Chen DN; Ke ZB; Cai H; Wei Y; Zheng QS; Huang JB; Li XD; Xue XY
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2018 May; 144(5):987-995. PubMed ID: 29504080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of a Structured Reporting Template on Adherence to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 and on the Diagnostic Performance of Prostate MRI for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Shaish H; Feltus W; Steinman J; Hecht E; Wenske S; Ahmed F
J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 May; 15(5):749-754. PubMed ID: 29506919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic value of multimodal ultrasound imaging in differentiating benign and malignant TI-RADS category 4 nodules.
Pei S; Cong S; Zhang B; Liang C; Zhang L; Liu J; Guo Y; Zhang S
Int J Clin Oncol; 2019 Jun; 24(6):632-639. PubMed ID: 30825007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Preliminary applicability evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 diagnostic score in 3.0T multi-parameters magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate specific antigen density for prostate cancer].
Zuo MZ; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Zhang CY; Wen R; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Wu JF; Li X; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 97(47):3693-3698. PubMed ID: 29325321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy of PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 Lesions.
Gosein M; Pang E; Chang S; Black P; Goldenberg L; Harris A; Yasenjiang J; Yousefi M
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 Aug; 69(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 29895436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictive value of PI-RADS classification in MRI-directed transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
NiMhurchu E; O'Kelly F; Murphy IG; Lavelle LP; Collins CD; Lennon G; Galvin D; Mulvin D; Quinlan D; McMahon CJ
Clin Radiol; 2016 Apr; 71(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 26880299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combination of ultrasound elastography with TI-RADS in the diagnosis of small thyroid nodules (≤10 mm): A new method to increase the diagnostic performance.
Du YR; Ji CL; Wu Y; Gu XG
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 109():33-40. PubMed ID: 30527309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combining Prostate Health Index density, magnetic resonance imaging and prior negative biopsy status to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Druskin SC; Tosoian JJ; Young A; Collica S; Srivastava A; Ghabili K; Macura KJ; Carter HB; Partin AW; Sokoll LJ; Ross AE; Pavlovich CP
BJU Int; 2018 Apr; 121(4):619-626. PubMed ID: 29232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Central zone lesions on magnetic resonance imaging: Should we be concerned?
Tan WP; Mazzone A; Shors S; Antoine N; Ekbal S; Khare N; McKiel C; Pessis D; Deane L
Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):31.e7-31.e12. PubMed ID: 27692837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposed Adjustments to PI-RADS Version 2 Decision Rules: Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection.
Rosenkrantz AB; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Ream JM
Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):119-129. PubMed ID: 27783538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Targeted MRI/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy in men with previous prostate biopsies using a novel registration software and multiparametric MRI PI-RADS scores: first results.
Tewes S; Hueper K; Hartung D; Imkamp F; Herrmann TR; Weidemann J; Renckly S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Peters I
World J Urol; 2015 Nov; 33(11):1707-14. PubMed ID: 25774003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.
Lin WC; Muglia VF; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Westphalen AC
Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20151056. PubMed ID: 27007818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score.
Shaish H; Casals R; Ahmed F; Makkar J; Wenske S
Acta Radiol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 32312102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
