These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30938751)
1. Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial. Harle CA; Golembiewski EH; Rahmanian KP; Brumback B; Krieger JL; Goodman KW; Mainous AG; Moseley RE J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Jul; 26(7):620-629. PubMed ID: 30938751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An Electronic Tool to Support Patient-Centered Broad Consent: A Multi-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial in Family Medicine. Golembiewski EH; Mainous AG; Rahmanian KP; Brumback B; Rooks BJ; Krieger JL; Goodman KW; Moseley RE; Harle CA Ann Fam Med; 2021; 19(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 33431386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study. Spencer K; Sanders C; Whitley EA; Lund D; Kaye J; Dixon WG J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e66. PubMed ID: 27083521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK. Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient Perspectives About Decisions to Share Medical Data and Biospecimens for Research. Kim J; Kim H; Bell E; Bath T; Paul P; Pham A; Jiang X; Zheng K; Ohno-Machado L JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Aug; 2(8):e199550. PubMed ID: 31433479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers. Kim KK; Sankar P; Wilson MD; Haynes SC BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):25. PubMed ID: 28376801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions? Willison DJ; Steeves V; Charles C; Schwartz L; Ranford J; Agarwal G; Cheng J; Thabane L BMC Med Ethics; 2009 Jul; 10():10. PubMed ID: 19630941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Getting meaningful informed consent from older adults: a structured literature review of empirical research. Sugarman J; McCrory DC; Hubal RC J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Apr; 46(4):517-24. PubMed ID: 9560079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research. Kim H; Bell E; Kim J; Sitapati A; Ramsdell J; Farcas C; Friedman D; Feupe SF; Ohno-Machado L J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 Mar; 24(2):380-387. PubMed ID: 27589942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Facilitating the ethical use of health data for the benefit of society: electronic health records, consent and the duty of easy rescue. Porsdam Mann S; Savulescu J; Sahakian BJ Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2016 Dec; 374(2083):. PubMed ID: 28336803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspectives on Electronic Informed Consent From Patients Underrepresented in Research in the United States: A Focus Group Study. Simon CM; Schartz HA; Rosenthal GE; Eisenstein EL; Klein DW J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2018 Oct; 13(4):338-348. PubMed ID: 29790410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Young people's views about consenting to data linkage: findings from the PEARL qualitative study. Audrey S; Brown L; Campbell R; Boyd A; Macleod J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():34. PubMed ID: 27001504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Research Use of Electronic Health Records: Patients' Views on Alternative Approaches to Permission. Hammack-Aviran CM; Brelsford KM; McKenna KC; Graham RD; Lampron ZM; Beskow LM AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(3):172-186. PubMed ID: 32338567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. 'I haven't met them, I don't have any trust in them. It just feels like a big unknown': a qualitative study exploring the determinants of consent to use Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority registry data in research. Carson C; Hinton L; Kurinczuk J; Quigley M BMJ Open; 2019 May; 9(5):e026469. PubMed ID: 31152033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public? Willison DJ; Schwartz L; Abelson J; Charles C; Swinton M; Northrup D; Thabane L J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 17712084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The importance of purpose: moving beyond consent in the societal use of personal health information. Grande D; Mitra N; Shah A; Wan F; Asch DA Ann Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 161(12):855-62. PubMed ID: 25506854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A qualitative study of the views of patients with human immunodeficiency virus and childhood trauma on the consent process for a neurocognitive and neuroimaging study. Bates H; Seedat S; Lester H Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2014 Oct; 15(4):362-74. PubMed ID: 24252666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. Goldenberg AJ; Hull SC; Botkin JR; Wilfond BS J Pediatr; 2009 Oct; 155(4):578-83. PubMed ID: 19595370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Patient preferences toward an interactive e-consent application for research using electronic health records. Harle CA; Golembiewski EH; Rahmanian KP; Krieger JL; Hagmajer D; Mainous AG; Moseley RE J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Mar; 25(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 29272408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials. Ryan RE; Prictor MJ; McLaughlin KJ; Hill SJ Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jan; (1):CD003717. PubMed ID: 18254029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]