BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30940067)

  • 1. AUTALASSO: an automatic adaptive LASSO for genome-wide prediction.
    Waldmann P; Ferenčaković M; Mészáros G; Khayatzadeh N; Curik I; Sölkner J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):167. PubMed ID: 30940067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
    Waldmann P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A proximal LAVA method for genome-wide association and prediction of traits with mixed inheritance patterns.
    Waldmann P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Oct; 22(1):523. PubMed ID: 34702175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sparse Convolutional Neural Networks for Genome-Wide Prediction.
    Waldmann P; Pfeiffer C; Mészáros G
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():25. PubMed ID: 32117441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approximate Bayesian neural networks in genomic prediction.
    Waldmann P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):70. PubMed ID: 30577737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic selection using regularized linear regression models: ridge regression, lasso, elastic net and their extensions.
    Ogutu JO; Schulz-Streeck T; Piepho HP
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. PubMed ID: 22640436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of genomic breeding values for meat tenderness in Polled Nellore cattle.
    Magnabosco CU; Lopes FB; Fragoso RC; Eifert EC; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Sainz RD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Jul; 94(7):2752-60. PubMed ID: 27482662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
    Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the Use of the Pearson Correlation Coefficient for Model Evaluation in Genome-Wide Prediction.
    Waldmann P
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():899. PubMed ID: 31632436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of methods for the implementation of genome-assisted evaluation of Spanish dairy cattle.
    Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):625-34. PubMed ID: 23102955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel genomic selection method combining GBLUP and LASSO.
    Li H; Wang J; Bao Z
    Genetica; 2015 Jun; 143(3):299-304. PubMed ID: 25655266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models.
    Azevedo CF; de Resende MD; E Silva FF; Viana JM; Valente MS; Resende MF; Muñoz P
    BMC Genet; 2015 Aug; 16():105. PubMed ID: 26303864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).
    Bangera R; Correa K; Lhorente JP; Figueroa R; Yáñez JM
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28143402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.
    van Binsbergen R; Calus MP; Bink MC; van Eeuwijk FA; Schrooten C; Veerkamp RF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):71. PubMed ID: 26381777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomic prediction for tick resistance in Braford and Hereford cattle.
    Cardoso FF; Gomes CC; Sollero BP; Oliveira MM; Roso VM; Piccoli ML; Higa RH; Yokoo MJ; Caetano AR; Aguilar I
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2693-705. PubMed ID: 26115257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of the GBLUP, emBayesB, and GWAS algorithms to predict genetic values in large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
    Dong L; Xiao S; Wang Q; Wang Z
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jun; 17():460. PubMed ID: 27301965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. LASSO with cross-validation for genomic selection.
    Usai MG; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
    Genet Res (Camb); 2009 Dec; 91(6):427-36. PubMed ID: 20122298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds.
    Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combining cow and bull reference populations to increase accuracy of genomic prediction and genome-wide association studies.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Veerkamp RF
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Oct; 96(10):6703-15. PubMed ID: 23891299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.