These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30940960)

  • 1. What Thailand's long-awaited election could mean for science.
    Mallapaty S
    Nature; 2019 Apr; 568(7750):13-14. PubMed ID: 30940960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cutting health and science support should not be an option in Argentina's election.
    Nature; 2023 Nov; 623(7986):224. PubMed ID: 37935973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Italian election leaves science out in the cold.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7693):411-412. PubMed ID: 29469119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nigeria ready for huge science spend.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jul; 442(7101):334. PubMed ID: 16871173
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brazil's presidential election could savage its science.
    Tollefson J
    Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7726):171-172. PubMed ID: 30301988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What Boris Johnson's leadership could mean for science.
    Else H
    Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7767):13-14. PubMed ID: 31363191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Brazil's government freezes nearly half of its science spending.
    Angelo C
    Nature; 2019 Apr; 568(7751):155-156. PubMed ID: 30967676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. US midterm elections: Deficit poses threat to science.
    Reich ES
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):760-1. PubMed ID: 20944701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cuts loom for US science.
    Semeniuk I; Thompson H
    Nature; 2012 Jul; 487(7408):414-5. PubMed ID: 22836976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US scientists protest cuts to research funding that aim to reduce national deficit.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2012 Nov; 345():e8101. PubMed ID: 23190913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. UK general election: five reasons it matters for science.
    O'Callaghan J; Gibney E
    Nature; 2024 Jul; 631(8019):14-16. PubMed ID: 38926563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Financial planning.
    Goldston D
    Nature; 2008 Aug; 454(7205):680. PubMed ID: 18685673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strength through diversity.
    Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7019):785. PubMed ID: 15602507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High stakes for science in UK election.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7293):1254-5. PubMed ID: 20428132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power shift stymies US science budget.
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7124):130-1. PubMed ID: 17215810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Science gets little love in Trump spending plan.
    Science News Staff
    Science; 2017 May; 356(6340):795. PubMed ID: 28546167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A two-year plan for US science.
    Greenberg DS
    Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):781-2. PubMed ID: 20944714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How Trump's science cuts could hurt states that voted for him.
    Witze A
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7654):273-274. PubMed ID: 28516935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. America's new leadership.
    Goldston D
    Nature; 2008 Nov; 456(7218):16. PubMed ID: 18987708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. US election: Know your representatives.
    Goldstein L
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7417):494-5. PubMed ID: 23018948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.