These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30942127)

  • 1. Running ground reaction force complexity at the initial stance phase increased with ageing.
    Zhang S; Li Y; Li L
    Sports Biomech; 2021 Aug; 20(5):619-628. PubMed ID: 30942127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ground reaction forces and kinematics in distance running in older-aged men.
    Bus SA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2003 Jul; 35(7):1167-75. PubMed ID: 12840638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of required coefficient of friction in running and walking.
    Vidal AB; Monezi LA; Sarro KJ; Barros RML
    Sports Biomech; 2021 Sep; 20(6):768-780. PubMed ID: 31070107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Self-Reported Foot-Strike Patterns Among Runners in Traditional and Minimalist Shoes.
    Goss DL; Lewek M; Yu B; Ware WB; Teyhen DS; Gross MT
    J Athl Train; 2015 Jun; 50(6):603-11. PubMed ID: 26098391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motion-control shoes help maintaining low loading rate levels during fatiguing running in pronated female runners.
    Jafarnezhadgero AA; Sorkhe E; Oliveira AS
    Gait Posture; 2019 Sep; 73():65-70. PubMed ID: 31299505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acute shoe effects on Achilles tendon loading in runners with habitual rearfoot strike pattern.
    Zhang X; Deng L; Yang Y; Li L; Fu W
    Gait Posture; 2020 Oct; 82():322-328. PubMed ID: 33022565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of shoe cushioning on landing impact forces and spatiotemporal parameters during running: results from a randomized trial including 800+ recreational runners.
    Malisoux L; Delattre N; Meyer C; Gette P; Urhausen A; Theisen D
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2021 Jul; 21(7):985-993. PubMed ID: 32781913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinetic changes with fatigue and relationship to injury in female runners.
    Gerlach KE; White SC; Burton HW; Dorn JM; Leddy JJ; Horvath PJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2005 Apr; 37(4):657-63. PubMed ID: 15809566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of running in standard and minimalist shoes.
    Willy RW; Davis IS
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Feb; 46(2):318-23. PubMed ID: 23877378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Shear cushions reduce the impact loading rate during walking and running.
    Chan MS; Huang SL; Shih Y; Chen CH; Shiang TY
    Sports Biomech; 2013 Nov; 12(4):334-42. PubMed ID: 24466646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Footwear characteristics are related to running mechanics in runners with patellofemoral pain.
    Esculier JF; Dubois B; Bouyer LJ; McFadyen BJ; Roy JS
    Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():144-147. PubMed ID: 28292715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 6-Week Transition to Maximal Running Shoes Does Not Change Running Biomechanics.
    Hannigan JJ; Pollard CD
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Mar; 47(4):968-973. PubMed ID: 30870034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ground reaction force differences between running shoes, racing flats, and distance spikes in runners.
    Logan S; Hunter I; J Ty Hopkins JT; Feland JB; Parcell AC
    J Sports Sci Med; 2010; 9(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 24149399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of negative joint work and vertical ground reaction force loading rates in Chi runners and rearfoot-striking runners.
    Goss DL; Gross MT
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2013 Oct; 43(10):685-92. PubMed ID: 24256170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term changes in running mechanics and foot strike pattern after introduction to minimalistic footwear.
    Willson JD; Bjorhus JS; Williams DS; Butler RJ; Porcari JP; Kernozek TW
    PM R; 2014 Jan; 6(1):34-43; quiz 43. PubMed ID: 23999160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer simulation of the effects of shoe cushioning on internal and external loading during running impacts.
    Miller RH; Hamill J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Aug; 12(4):481-90. PubMed ID: 19225961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ground Reaction Force Differences between Bionic Shoes and Neutral Running Shoes in Recreational Male Runners before and after a 5 km Run.
    Jiang X; Zhou H; Quan W; Hu Q; Baker JS; Gu Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(18):. PubMed ID: 34574713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the ground reaction force frequency content during rearfoot and non-rearfoot running patterns.
    Gruber AH; Edwards WB; Hamill J; Derrick TR; Boyer KA
    Gait Posture; 2017 Jul; 56():54-59. PubMed ID: 28499137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study.
    Kluitenberg B; Bredeweg SW; Zijlstra S; Zijlstra W; Buist I
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Nov; 13():235. PubMed ID: 23186326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of minimalist footwear and stride length reduction on lower-extremity running mechanics and cumulative loading.
    Firminger CR; Edwards WB
    J Sci Med Sport; 2016 Dec; 19(12):975-979. PubMed ID: 27107980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.