These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30943240)

  • 1. From North American hegemony to global competition for scientific leadership? Insights from the Nobel population.
    Heinze T; Jappe A; Pithan D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0213916. PubMed ID: 30943240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Colombian scientific elite-Science mapping and a comparison with Nobel Prize laureates using a composite citation indicator.
    Cortés JD; Andrade DA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0269116. PubMed ID: 35617365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
    Heinze T; von der Heyden M; Pithan D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239805. PubMed ID: 32997679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why there should be more science Nobel prizes and laureates - And why proportionate credit should be awarded to institutions.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2007; 68(3):471-3. PubMed ID: 17127013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do Nobel Laureates Create Prize-Winning Networks? An Analysis of Collaborative Research in Physiology or Medicine.
    Wagner CS; Horlings E; Whetsell TA; Mattsson P; Nordqvist K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134164. PubMed ID: 26230622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correction: From North American hegemony to global competition for scientific leadership? Insights from the Nobel population.
    Heinze T; Jappe A; Pithan D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219582. PubMed ID: 31287840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific elite revisited: patterns of productivity, collaboration, authorship and impact.
    Li J; Yin Y; Fortunato S; Wang D
    J R Soc Interface; 2020 Apr; 17(165):20200135. PubMed ID: 32316884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sources of funding for Nobel Prize-winning work: public or private?
    Tatsioni A; Vavva E; Ioannidis JP
    FASEB J; 2010 May; 24(5):1335-9. PubMed ID: 20056712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Give science and peace a chance: Speeches by Nobel laureates in the sciences, 1901-2018.
    Bucchi M; Loner E; Fattorini E
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223505. PubMed ID: 31593575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the Nobel Prize good for science?
    Casadevall A; Fang FC
    FASEB J; 2013 Dec; 27(12):4682-90. PubMed ID: 24008752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trajectories of biomedical research leading to Nobel Prize-winning discoveries.
    Burnett WJ; Balas EA; Heboyan V; Matthews KRW
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2024 Jun; 1536(1):177-187. PubMed ID: 38837420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Family background and genius II: Nobel laureates in science.
    Rothenberg A
    Can J Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 50(14):918-25. PubMed ID: 16494261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A meaningful legacy: urologists as Nobel Prize laureates.
    Mouraviev V; Gleave ME
    Can J Urol; 2003 Feb; 10(1):1737-42. PubMed ID: 12625851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global estimates of HIV infections and AIDS cases: 1991.
    Chin J
    AIDS; 1991; 5 Suppl 2():S57-61. PubMed ID: 1845061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014.
    Schlagberger EM; Bornmann L; Bauer J
    Scientometrics; 2016; 109(2):723-767. PubMed ID: 27795592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientometric identification of elite 'revolutionary science' research institutions by analysis of trends in Nobel prizes 1947-2006.
    Charlton BG
    Med Hypotheses; 2007; 68(5):931-4. PubMed ID: 17234352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nobel Prize nominees and the rise of urology in Europe around 1900.
    Hansson N; Krischel M; Halling T; Moll F; Fangerau H
    World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1291-1295. PubMed ID: 28004145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A message for young child neurologists: a lesson from the Nobel Prize centennial].
    Kamoshita S
    No To Hattatsu; 2004 Mar; 36(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 15031983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The laureate as celebrity genius: How Scientific American's John Horgan profiled Nobel Prize winners.
    Fahy D
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 May; 27(4):433-445. PubMed ID: 29720060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting 2018: Added value - and reflection - for participants, institutes and disciplines.
    Lewis P; Erren TC
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2019 Mar; 40(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 31184815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.