These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30943955)

  • 1. Parsing clinical text using the state-of-the-art deep learning based parsers: a systematic comparison.
    Zhang Y; Tiryaki F; Jiang M; Xu H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Apr; 19(Suppl 3):77. PubMed ID: 30943955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A two-site survey of medical center personnel's willingness to share clinical data for research: implications for reproducible health NLP research.
    Weng C; Friedman C; Rommel CA; Hurdle JF
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Apr; 19(Suppl 3):70. PubMed ID: 30943963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of deep learning methods for de-identification of clinical notes in cross-institute settings.
    Yang X; Lyu T; Li Q; Lee CY; Bian J; Hogan WR; Wu Y
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Dec; 19(Suppl 5):232. PubMed ID: 31801524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical Trial Participants' Views of the Risks and Benefits of Data Sharing.
    Mello MM; Lieou V; Goodman SN
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Jun; 378(23):2202-2211. PubMed ID: 29874542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of De-Identification on Clinical Text Classification Using Traditional and Deep Learning Classifiers.
    Obeid JS; Heider PM; Weeda ER; Matuskowitz AJ; Carr CM; Gagnon K; Crawford T; Meystre SM
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Aug; 264():283-287. PubMed ID: 31437930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parsing clinical text: how good are the state-of-the-art parsers?
    Jiang M; Huang Y; Fan JW; Tang B; Denny J; Xu H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2015; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 26045009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The benefits, risks and costs of privacy: patient preferences and willingness to pay.
    Trachtenbarg DE; Asche C; Ramsahai S; Duling J; Ren J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2017 May; 33(5):845-851. PubMed ID: 28166481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fair Shares and Sharing Fairly: A Survey of Public Views on Open Science, Informed Consent and Participatory Research in Biobanking.
    Joly Y; Dalpé G; So D; Birko S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0129893. PubMed ID: 26154134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Public attitudes regarding willingness to participate in medical research studies.
    Trauth JM; Musa D; Siminoff L; Jewell IK; Ricci E
    J Health Soc Policy; 2000; 12(2):23-43. PubMed ID: 11184441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consent and widespread access to personal health information for the delivery of care: a large scale telephone survey of consumers' attitudes using vignettes in New Zealand.
    Whiddett D; Hunter I; McDonald B; Norris T; Waldon J
    BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011640. PubMed ID: 27554103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing annotation resources for natural language de-identification via a game theoretic framework.
    Li M; Carrell D; Aberdeen J; Hirschman L; Kirby J; Li B; Vorobeychik Y; Malin BA
    J Biomed Inform; 2016 Jun; 61():97-109. PubMed ID: 27020263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Barriers and facilitators to qualitative data sharing in the United States: A survey of qualitative researchers.
    Mozersky J; McIntosh T; Walsh HA; Parsons MV; Goodman M; DuBois JM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261719. PubMed ID: 34972126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Research Participant Views regarding Qualitative Data Sharing.
    Mozersky J; Parsons M; Walsh H; Baldwin K; McIntosh T; DuBois JM
    Ethics Hum Res; 2020 Mar; 42(2):13-27. PubMed ID: 32233117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. To share or not to share? Expected pros and cons of data sharing in radiological research.
    Sardanelli F; Alì M; Hunink MG; Houssami N; Sconfienza LM; Di Leo G
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2328-2335. PubMed ID: 29349697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deep Learning Approaches Outperform Conventional Strategies in De-Identification of German Medical Reports.
    Richter-Pechanski P; Amr A; Katus HA; Dieterich C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2019 Sep; 267():101-109. PubMed ID: 31483261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patients' Willingness to Provide Their Clinical Data for Research Purposes and Acceptance of Different Consent Models: Findings From a Representative Survey of Patients With Cancer.
    Köngeter A; Schickhardt C; Jungkunz M; Bergbold S; Mehlis K; Winkler EC
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Aug; 24(8):e37665. PubMed ID: 36006690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who is willing to participate in low-risk pragmatic clinical trials without consent?
    Dal-Ré R; Carcas AJ; Carné X
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 73(12):1557-1563. PubMed ID: 28900674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A De-identification method for bilingual clinical texts of various note types.
    Shin SY; Park YR; Shin Y; Choi HJ; Park J; Lyu Y; Lee MS; Choi CM; Kim WS; Lee JH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2015 Jan; 30(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 25552878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A data-sharing agreement helps to increase researchers' willingness to share primary data: results from a randomized controlled trial.
    Polanin JR; Terzian M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():60-69. PubMed ID: 30342969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.