These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30944968)

  • 1. Optimal non-invasive treatment of 1-2.5 cm radiolucent renal stones: oral dissolution therapy, shock wave lithotripsy or combined treatment-a randomized controlled trial.
    Elbaset MA; Hashem A; Eraky A; Badawy MA; El-Assmy A; Sheir KZ; Shokeir AA
    World J Urol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):207-212. PubMed ID: 30944968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of large pediatric renal pelvic stone burden more than 2 cm.
    Mohamed ER; Elmogazy HM; Zanaty AK; Elsharkawi AM; Riad AM; Badawy AA
    J Pediatr Urol; 2023 Oct; 19(5):561.e1-561.e11. PubMed ID: 37414650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.
    Abdelhamid M; Mosharafa AA; Ibrahim H; Selim HM; Hamed M; Elghoneimy MN; Salem HK; Abdelazim MS; Badawy H
    J Endourol; 2016 Nov; 30(11):1227-1232. PubMed ID: 27597174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of shockwave lithotripsy use for single medium sized hard renal stone with stone density ≥ 1000 HU. A prospective study.
    Elbaset MA; Taha DE; Anas M; Abouelkheir RT; Edwan M; Abdullateef M; Ashour R; Osman Y; Sheir KZ
    World J Urol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):243-250. PubMed ID: 34392391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.
    Garg M; Johnson H; Lee SM; Rai BP; Somani B; Philip J
    Curr Urol Rep; 2023 Apr; 24(4):173-185. PubMed ID: 36802317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.
    Kaya C; Kaynak Y; Karabag A; Aykaç A
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2020; 16(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 31989897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Management of Renal Stones in Children: Does Anesthesia Affect the Treatment Outcomes on an Age-based Manner?
    Tuncer M; Çevik B; Eryıldırım B; Faydacı G; Sarıca K
    Urology; 2017 Sep; 107():218-222. PubMed ID: 28546088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.
    Pareek G; Hedican SP; Lee FT; Nakada SY
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):941-4. PubMed ID: 16286099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.
    Wiesenthal JD; Ghiculete D; D'A Honey RJ; Pace KT
    Urol Res; 2010 Aug; 38(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20625891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
    Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of computed tomography findings for success prediction after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stone disease.
    Celik S; Bozkurt O; Kaya FG; Egriboyun S; Demir O; Secil M; Celebi I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2015 Jan; 47(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 25311505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided shockwave lithotripsy and predictors of its success rate in pediatric population: A report from a national reference center.
    Grabsky A; Tsaturyan A; Musheghyan L; Minasyan G; Khachatryan Y; Shadyan G; Qocharyan A; Mosoyan M; Kallidonis P
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Feb; 17(1):78.e1-78.e7. PubMed ID: 33153916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reinforcement of the Triple D score with simple addition of the intrarenal location for the prediction of the stone-free rate after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones 10-20 mm in diameter.
    Ichiyanagi O; Fukuhara H; Kurokawa M; Izumi T; Suzuki H; Naito S; Nishida H; Kato T; Tsuchiya N
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2019 Feb; 51(2):239-245. PubMed ID: 30604235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The success of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treating moderate-sized (10-20 mm) renal stones.
    Chung VY; Turney BW
    Urolithiasis; 2016 Oct; 44(5):441-4. PubMed ID: 26743071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is stone radiodensity a useful parameter for predicting outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones < or = 2 cm?
    Krishnamurthy MS; Ferucci PG; Sankey N; Chandhoke PS
    Int Braz J Urol; 2005; 31(1):3-8; discussion 9. PubMed ID: 15763001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.
    Chan LH; Good DW; Laing K; Phipps S; Thomas BG; Keanie JY; Tolley DA; Cutress ML
    J Endourol; 2017 May; 31(5):510-516. PubMed ID: 28355100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for high-density moderate-sized renal stones: A prospective randomized study.
    Gadelmoula M; Elderwy AA; Abdelkawi IF; Moeen AM; Althamthami G; Abdel-Moneim AM
    Urol Ann; 2019; 11(4):426-431. PubMed ID: 31649466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) still suitable for >1.5 cm intrarenal stones? Data analysis of 1902 SWLs.
    Azal Neto W; Morales E; Joseane Pachecco M; Pedro RN; Reis LO
    Scand J Urol; 2021 Oct; 55(5):388-393. PubMed ID: 34279162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
    Müllhaupt G; Engeler DS; Schmid HP; Abt D
    BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():72. PubMed ID: 26201514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography.
    El-Nahas AR; El-Assmy AM; Mansour O; Sheir KZ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jun; 51(6):1688-93; discussion 1693-4. PubMed ID: 17161522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.