These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30945169)

  • 1. Relevance-based processing: Little role for task-relevant expectations.
    Tapal A; Yeshurun Y; Eitam B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1426-1432. PubMed ID: 30945169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Blinded by irrelevance: pure irrelevance induced "blindness".
    Eitam B; Yeshurun Y; Hassan K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):611-5. PubMed ID: 23506113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness.
    Cartwright-Finch U; Lavie N
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):321-40. PubMed ID: 16480973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing without knowing: task relevance dissociates between visual awareness and recognition.
    Eitam B; Shoval R; Yeshurun Y
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2015 Mar; 1339():125-37. PubMed ID: 25716140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined expectancies: the role of expectations for the coding of salient bottom-up signals.
    Wiesing M; Fink GR; Weidner R; Vossel S
    Exp Brain Res; 2020 Feb; 238(2):381-393. PubMed ID: 31932865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Irrelevant reward and selection histories have different influences on task-relevant attentional selection.
    MacLean MH; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jul; 77(5):1515-28. PubMed ID: 25813737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The fate of task-irrelevant visual motion: perceptual load versus feature-based attention.
    Taya S; Adams WJ; Graf EW; Lavie N
    J Vis; 2009 Nov; 9(12):12.1-10. PubMed ID: 20053103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural Signatures of Conscious Face Perception in an Inattentional Blindness Paradigm.
    Shafto JP; Pitts MA
    J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 35(31):10940-8. PubMed ID: 26245958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of task-irrelevant grouping on visual selection in partial report.
    Lunau R; Habekost T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1323-1335. PubMed ID: 28364367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cogito ergo video: Task-relevant information is involuntarily boosted into awareness.
    Gayet S; Brascamp JW; Van der Stigchel S; Paffen CL
    J Vis; 2015; 15(5):3. PubMed ID: 26067521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What's past is past: Neither perceptual preactivation nor prior motivational relevance decrease subsequent inattentional blindness.
    Kreitz C; Schnuerch R; Furley PA; Memmert D
    Conscious Cogn; 2018 Mar; 59():1-9. PubMed ID: 29413870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural correlates of goal-directed enhancement and suppression of visual stimuli in the absence of conscious perception.
    Travis SL; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1346-1364. PubMed ID: 30378084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of perceptual load on semantic processing under inattention.
    Koivisto M; Revonsuo A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Oct; 16(5):864-8. PubMed ID: 19815790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prior conscious experience enhances conscious perception but does not affect response priming☆.
    Lamy D; Carmel T; Peremen Z
    Cognition; 2017 Mar; 160():62-81. PubMed ID: 28056385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expectation-based blindness: Predictions about object categories gate awareness of focally attended objects.
    Zivony A; Eimer M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1879-1889. PubMed ID: 35581491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How Does Awareness Modulate Goal-Directed and Stimulus-Driven Shifts of Attention Triggered by Value Learning?
    Bourgeois A; Neveu R; Vuilleumier P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160469. PubMed ID: 27483371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory working memory load impairs visual ventral stream processing: toward a unified model of attentional load.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Bühler M; Menz MM; Rose M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 22(3):437-46. PubMed ID: 19302005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-irrelevant memory load induces inattentional blindness without temporo-parietal suppression.
    Matsuyoshi D; Ikeda T; Sawamoto N; Kakigi R; Fukuyama H; Osaka N
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Aug; 48(10):3094-101. PubMed ID: 20600188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.