These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30945219)

  • 1. Exploring Protein Supersecondary Structure Through Changes in Protein Folding, Stability, and Flexibility.
    Pires DEV; Rodrigues CHM; Albanaz ATS; Karmakar M; Myung Y; Xavier J; Michanetzi EM; Portelli S; Ascher DB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():173-185. PubMed ID: 30945219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DynaMut: predicting the impact of mutations on protein conformation, flexibility and stability.
    Rodrigues CH; Pires DE; Ascher DB
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W350-W355. PubMed ID: 29718330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computational Prediction of Secondary and Supersecondary Structures from Protein Sequences.
    Oldfield CJ; Chen K; Kurgan L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():73-100. PubMed ID: 30945214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of impacts of mutations on protein structure and interactions: SDM, a statistical approach, and mCSM, using machine learning.
    Pandurangan AP; Blundell TL
    Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):247-257. PubMed ID: 31693276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational simulations of protein folding to engineer amino acid sequences to encourage desired supersecondary structure formation.
    Gerstman BS; Chapagain PP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 932():191-204. PubMed ID: 22987354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EASE-MM: Sequence-Based Prediction of Mutation-Induced Stability Changes with Feature-Based Multiple Models.
    Folkman L; Stantic B; Sattar A; Zhou Y
    J Mol Biol; 2016 Mar; 428(6):1394-1405. PubMed ID: 26804571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Information-Theoretic Inference of an Optimal Dictionary of Protein Supersecondary Structures.
    Konagurthu AS; Subramanian R; Allison L; Abramson D; de la Banda MG; Stuckey PJ; Lesk AM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():123-131. PubMed ID: 30945216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Protein folding at atomic resolution: analysis of autonomously folding supersecondary structure motifs by nuclear magnetic resonance.
    Sborgi L; Verma A; Sadqi M; de Alba E; Muñoz V
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 932():205-18. PubMed ID: 22987355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A survey of machine learning methods for secondary and supersecondary protein structure prediction.
    Ho HK; Zhang L; Ramamohanarao K; Martin S
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 932():87-106. PubMed ID: 22987348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applications of Normal Mode Analysis Methods in Computational Protein Design.
    Frappier V; Chartier M; Najmanovich R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():203-214. PubMed ID: 27914052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting the Effect of Mutations on Protein Folding and Protein-Protein Interactions.
    Strokach A; Corbi-Verge C; Teyra J; Kim PM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1851():1-17. PubMed ID: 30298389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Protodomains: Symmetry-Related Supersecondary Structures in Proteins and Self-Complementarity.
    Youkharibache P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():187-219. PubMed ID: 30945220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational tools help improve protein stability but with a solubility tradeoff.
    Broom A; Jacobi Z; Trainor K; Meiering EM
    J Biol Chem; 2017 Sep; 292(35):14349-14361. PubMed ID: 28710274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sibe: a computation tool to apply protein sequence statistics to predict folding and design in silico.
    Cheung NJ; Yu W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 20(1):455. PubMed ID: 31492097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computational Protein Design Through Grafting and Stabilization.
    Zhu C; Mowrey DD; Dokholyan NV
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():227-241. PubMed ID: 27914054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current Approaches in Supersecondary Structures Investigation.
    Rudnev VR; Kulikova LI; Nikolsky KS; Malsagova KA; Kopylov AT; Kaysheva AL
    Int J Mol Sci; 2021 Nov; 22(21):. PubMed ID: 34769310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast and accurate predictions of protein stability changes upon mutations using statistical potentials and neural networks: PoPMuSiC-2.0.
    Dehouck Y; Grosfils A; Folch B; Gilis D; Bogaerts P; Rooman M
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 25(19):2537-43. PubMed ID: 19654118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asymmetric protein design from conserved supersecondary structures.
    ElGamacy M; Coles M; Lupas A
    J Struct Biol; 2018 Dec; 204(3):380-387. PubMed ID: 30558718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting the Effect of Amino Acid Single-Point Mutations on Protein Stability-Large-Scale Validation of MD-Based Relative Free Energy Calculations.
    Steinbrecher T; Zhu C; Wang L; Abel R; Negron C; Pearlman D; Feyfant E; Duan J; Sherman W
    J Mol Biol; 2017 Apr; 429(7):948-963. PubMed ID: 27964946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the performance of computational predictors for estimating protein stability changes upon missense mutations.
    Iqbal S; Li F; Akutsu T; Ascher DB; Webb GI; Song J
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34058752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.