These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30945219)

  • 21. Exploring local and non-local interactions for protein stability by structural motif engineering.
    Niggemann M; Steipe B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Feb; 296(1):181-95. PubMed ID: 10656826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Machine learning algorithms for predicting protein folding rates and stability of mutant proteins: comparison with statistical methods.
    Gromiha MM; Huang LT
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2011 Sep; 12(6):490-502. PubMed ID: 21787301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A fast and precise approach for computational saturation mutagenesis and its experimental validation by using an artificial (βα)8-barrel protein.
    Fischer A; Seitz T; Lochner A; Sterner R; Merkl R; Bocola M
    Chembiochem; 2011 Jul; 12(10):1544-50. PubMed ID: 21626637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mega-scale experimental analysis of protein folding stability in biology and design.
    Tsuboyama K; Dauparas J; Chen J; Laine E; Mohseni Behbahani Y; Weinstein JJ; Mangan NM; Ovchinnikov S; Rocklin GJ
    Nature; 2023 Aug; 620(7973):434-444. PubMed ID: 37468638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting protein thermal stability changes upon point mutations using statistical potentials: Introducing HoTMuSiC.
    Pucci F; Bourgeas R; Rooman M
    Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():23257. PubMed ID: 26988870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robust folding of a de novo designed ideal protein even with most of the core mutated to valine.
    Koga R; Yamamoto M; Kosugi T; Kobayashi N; Sugiki T; Fujiwara T; Koga N
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Dec; 117(49):31149-31156. PubMed ID: 33229587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Supersecondary structure prediction of transmembrane beta-barrel proteins.
    Tran Vdu T; Chassignet P; Steyaert JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 932():277-94. PubMed ID: 22987359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Exploring folding free energy landscapes using computational protein design.
    Kuhlman B; Baker D
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2004 Feb; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15102454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rosetta FunFolDes - A general framework for the computational design of functional proteins.
    Bonet J; Wehrle S; Schriever K; Yang C; Billet A; Sesterhenn F; Scheck A; Sverrisson F; Veselkova B; Vollers S; Lourman R; Villard M; Rosset S; Krey T; Correia BE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Nov; 14(11):e1006623. PubMed ID: 30452434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computational prediction of secondary and supersecondary structures.
    Chen K; Kurgan L
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 932():63-86. PubMed ID: 22987347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Designing cooperativity into the designed protein Top7.
    Yadahalli S; Gosavi S
    Proteins; 2014 Mar; 82(3):364-74. PubMed ID: 23966061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Structure-based prediction of the effects of a missense variant on protein stability.
    Yang Y; Chen B; Tan G; Vihinen M; Shen B
    Amino Acids; 2013 Mar; 44(3):847-55. PubMed ID: 23064876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. StackSSSPred: A Stacking-Based Prediction of Supersecondary Structure from Sequence.
    Flot M; Mishra A; Kuchi AS; Hoque MT
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():101-122. PubMed ID: 30945215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Engineering more stable proteins.
    Kazlauskas R
    Chem Soc Rev; 2018 Dec; 47(24):9026-9045. PubMed ID: 30306986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. PremPS: Predicting the impact of missense mutations on protein stability.
    Chen Y; Lu H; Zhang N; Zhu Z; Wang S; Li M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1008543. PubMed ID: 33378330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. DUET: a server for predicting effects of mutations on protein stability using an integrated computational approach.
    Pires DE; Ascher DB; Blundell TL
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(Web Server issue):W314-9. PubMed ID: 24829462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Computational tools for designing and engineering biocatalysts.
    Damborsky J; Brezovsky J
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2009 Feb; 13(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 19297237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reviewing Challenges of Predicting Protein Melting Temperature Change Upon Mutation Through the Full Analysis of a Highly Detailed Dataset with High-Resolution Structures.
    Louis BBV; Abriata LA
    Mol Biotechnol; 2021 Oct; 63(10):863-884. PubMed ID: 34101125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A modular perspective of protein structures: application to fragment based loop modeling.
    Fernandez-Fuentes N; Fiser A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 932():141-58. PubMed ID: 22987351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. DynaMut2: Assessing changes in stability and flexibility upon single and multiple point missense mutations.
    Rodrigues CHM; Pires DEV; Ascher DB
    Protein Sci; 2021 Jan; 30(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 32881105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.