These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30945892)

  • 1. From discipline-centered rivalries to solution-centered science: Producing better probability estimates for policy makers.
    Mellers BA; Tetlock PE
    Am Psychol; 2019 Apr; 74(3):290-300. PubMed ID: 30945892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bringing probability judgments into policy debates via forecasting tournaments.
    Tetlock PE; Mellers BA; Scoblic JP
    Science; 2017 Feb; 355(6324):481-483. PubMed ID: 28154049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The psychology of intelligence analysis: drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.
    Mellers B; Stone E; Atanasov P; Rohrbaugh N; Metz SE; Ungar L; Bishop MM; Horowitz M; Merkle E; Tetlock P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Mar; 21(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 25581088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament.
    Mellers B; Ungar L; Baron J; Ramos J; Gurcay B; Fincher K; Scott SE; Moore D; Atanasov P; Swift SA; Murray T; Stone E; Tetlock PE
    Psychol Sci; 2014 May; 25(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 24659192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forecasting tournaments, epistemic humility and attitude depolarization.
    Mellers B; Tetlock P; Arkes HR
    Cognition; 2019 Jul; 188():19-26. PubMed ID: 30389145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identifying and cultivating superforecasters as a method of improving probabilistic predictions.
    Mellers B; Stone E; Murray T; Minster A; Rohrbaugh N; Bishop M; Chen E; Baker J; Hou Y; Horowitz M; Ungar L; Tetlock P
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 May; 10(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 25987508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The wisdom of many in few: Finding individuals who are as wise as the crowd.
    Himmelstein M; Budescu DV; Ho EH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 May; 152(5):1223-1244. PubMed ID: 36862490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving Intelligence Analysis With Decision Science.
    Dhami MK; Mandel DR; Mellers BA; Tetlock PE
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 10(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 26581731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy gains from conservative forecasting: Tests using variations of 19 econometric models to predict 154 elections in 10 countries.
    Graefe A; Green KC; Armstrong JS
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209850. PubMed ID: 30629630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attractors: Incidental values that influence forecasts of change.
    Critcher CR; Rosenzweig EL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Feb; 151(2):475-492. PubMed ID: 34472959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Premature predictions: Accurate forecasters are not viewed as more competent for earlier predictions.
    Mislavsky R; Gaertig C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Jan; 153(1):159-170. PubMed ID: 37870813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Choice Restriction on Accuracy and User Experience in an Internet-Based Geopolitical Forecasting Task.
    Widmer CL; Summerville A; Juvina I; Minnery BS
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():662279. PubMed ID: 34335374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cultivating researcher-policymaker partnerships: A randomized controlled trial of a model for training public psychologists.
    Crowley DM; Scott JT; Long EC; Green L; Giray C; Gay B; Israel A; Storace R; McCauley M; Donovan M
    Am Psychol; 2021 Nov; 76(8):1307-1322. PubMed ID: 35113595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combining forecasts from advisors: The impact of advice independence and verbal versus numeric format.
    Strueder JD; Windschitl PD
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2024 Aug; 153(8):2088-2099. PubMed ID: 39101908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When and why people misestimate future feelings: Identifying strengths and weaknesses in affective forecasting.
    Lench HC; Levine LJ; Perez K; Carpenter ZK; Carlson SJ; Bench SW; Wan Y
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2019 May; 116(5):724-742. PubMed ID: 30604985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compromising improves forecasting.
    Ferreiro DN; Deroy O; Bahrami B
    R Soc Open Sci; 2023 May; 10(5):221216. PubMed ID: 37206966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human judgement forecasting tournaments: A feasibility study based on the COVID-19 pandemic with public health practitioners in England.
    Davies N; Ferris S
    Public Health Pract (Oxf); 2022 Jun; 3():100260. PubMed ID: 35479262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How psychologists help solve real-world problems in multidisciplinary research teams: Introduction to the special issue.
    Proctor RW; Vu KL
    Am Psychol; 2019 Apr; 74(3):271-277. PubMed ID: 30945890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Six rules for accurate effective forecasting.
    Saffo P
    Harv Bus Rev; 2007; 85(7-8):122-31, 193. PubMed ID: 17642131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact bias or underestimation? Outcome specifications predict the direction of affective forecasting errors.
    Buechel EC; Zhang J; Morewedge CK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 May; 146(5):746-761. PubMed ID: 28368193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.