These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30945908)

  • 1. Complexity drives speech sound development: Evidence from artificial language training.
    Maggu AR; Kager R; Xu S; Wong PCM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 May; 45(5):628-644. PubMed ID: 30945908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Listen-and-repeat training improves perception of second language vowel duration: Evidence from mismatch negativity (MMN) and N1 responses and behavioral discrimination.
    Saloranta A; Alku P; Peltola MS
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jan; 147():72-82. PubMed ID: 31743699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The phonological form of lexical items modulates the encoding of challenging second-language sound contrasts.
    Llompart M; Reinisch E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1590-1610. PubMed ID: 32162959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Behavioral effect of mismatch negativity neurofeedback on foreign language learning.
    Chang M; Ando H; Maeda T; Naruse Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254771. PubMed ID: 34283873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specialized memory systems for learning spoken words.
    McQueen JM; Eisner F; Burgering MA; Vroomen J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Jan; 46(1):189-199. PubMed ID: 30883166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonetic training and non-native speech perception--New memory traces evolve in just three days as indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and behavioural measures.
    Tamminen H; Peltola MS; Kujala T; Näätänen R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jul; 97(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 25956191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye movements reveal persistent sensitivity to sound symbolism during word learning.
    Revill KP; Namy LL; Nygaard LC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):680-698. PubMed ID: 29094990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning-induced neural plasticity of speech processing before birth.
    Partanen E; Kujala T; Näätänen R; Liitola A; Sambeth A; Huotilainen M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Sep; 110(37):15145-50. PubMed ID: 23980148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contextual variability and exemplar strength in phonotactic learning.
    Denby T; Schecter J; Arn S; Dimov S; Goldrick M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Feb; 44(2):280-294. PubMed ID: 28933893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Specificity and generalization in perceptual adaptation to accented speech.
    Alexander JED; Nygaard LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jun; 145(6):3382. PubMed ID: 31255164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perceptual training enhances temporal acuity for multisensory speech.
    De Niear MA; Gupta PB; Baum SH; Wallace MT
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2018 Jan; 147():9-17. PubMed ID: 29107704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-free auditory EEG paradigm for probing multiple levels of speech processing in the brain.
    Gansonre C; Højlund A; Leminen A; Bailey C; Shtyrov Y
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Nov; 55(11):e13216. PubMed ID: 30101984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in sensory processing of German vowels and physically matched non-speech sounds as revealed by the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the human event-related brain potential (ERP).
    Christmann CA; Berti S; Steinbrink C; Lachmann T
    Brain Lang; 2014 Sep; 136():8-18. PubMed ID: 25108306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds.
    Froyen D; Van Atteveldt N; Bonte M; Blomert L
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 430(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 18023979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speaker identity supports phonetic category learning.
    Mani N; Schneider S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):623-9. PubMed ID: 23148468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Similarities in the neural signature for the processing of behaviorally categorized and uncategorized speech sounds.
    Signoret C; Gaudrain E; Perrin F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 37(5):777-85. PubMed ID: 23281939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.
    Theodore RM; Monto NR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sleep and native language interference affect non-native speech sound learning.
    Earle FS; Myers EB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1680-95. PubMed ID: 26280264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.