These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30946137)

  • 1. Effect of Compression on Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Gilbert M; Jiradejvong P; Limb C
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1368-1375. PubMed ID: 30946137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users: A Comparison in Bass Frequency Perception Between Fine Structure Processing and High-Definition Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategies.
    Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 25906173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
    Wright R; Uchanski RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
    Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Musical sound quality impairments in cochlear implant (CI) users as a function of limited high-frequency perception.
    Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Dec; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 23172009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reverberation negatively impacts musical sound quality for cochlear implant users.
    Roy AT; Vigeant M; Munjal T; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S105-13. PubMed ID: 26561881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Music Is More Enjoyable With Two Ears, Even If One of Them Receives a Degraded Signal Provided By a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM; Vermeire K; Stupak N; Lavender A; Neukam J; Van de Heyning P; Svirsky MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):476-490. PubMed ID: 31469701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear Implant Compression Optimization for Musical Sound Quality in MED-EL Users.
    Gilbert ML; Deroche MLD; Jiradejvong P; Chan Barrett K; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):862-873. PubMed ID: 34812791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deeper Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Angle Improves Detection of Musical Sound Quality Deterioration Related to Bass Frequency Removal.
    Roy AT; Penninger RT; Pearl MS; Wuerfel W; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Buechner A; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Feb; 37(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 26669557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
    McDermott HJ
    Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of the Phantom Electrode strategy to improve bass frequency perception for music listening in cochlear implant users.
    Munjal T; Roy AT; Carver C; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S121-8. PubMed ID: 26561883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study.
    Macherey O; Delpierre A
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):426-36. PubMed ID: 23334356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of Frequency Response Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Mo J; Jiam NT; Deroche MLD; Jiradejvong P; Limb CJ
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221120017. PubMed ID: 35983700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sound quality perception of cochlear implant recipients: low-frequency information and foreign-language effect.
    Arslan NÖ; Akbulut AA; Köse B; Karaman-Demirel A; Derinsu U
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Dec; 61(12):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 34894993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
    Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Impact of Vocal Boost Manipulations on Musical Sound Quality for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Limb CJ; Mo J; Jiradejvong P; Jiam NT
    Laryngoscope; 2023 Apr; 133(4):938-947. PubMed ID: 35906889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in Perception of Musical Stimuli among Acoustic, Electric, and Combined Modality Listeners.
    Prentiss SM; Friedland DR; Nash JJ; Runge CL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):494-501. PubMed ID: 26055838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of input compression and input frequency response on music perception in cochlear implant users.
    Halliwell ER; Jones LL; Fraser M; Lockley M; Hill-Feltham P; McKay CM
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):401-7. PubMed ID: 25546030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cochlear implant users rely on tempo rather than on pitch information during perception of musical emotion.
    Caldwell M; Rankin SK; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 3():S114-20. PubMed ID: 26561882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.