These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

729 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30946362)

  • 1. Uterine-preserving pelvic organ prolapse surgery using the UPHOLD LITE vaginal support system: The outcomes of 291 patients.
    Chang CP; Hsu FK; Lai MJ; Chang WH; Lee NR; Lee HL; Horng HC; Wang PH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Apr; 98(14):e15086. PubMed ID: 30946362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthetic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice.
    Deffieux X; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Campagne-Loiseau S; Donon L; Levesque A; Rigaud J; Stivalet N; Venara A; Thubert T; Vidart A; Bosset PO; Revel-Delhom C; Lucot JP; Hermieu JF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Mar; 294():170-179. PubMed ID: 38280271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
    Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sacrospinous hysteropexy with a low weight transvaginal polypropylene mesh for treatment of complete uterovaginal eversion.
    Achermann APP; Brazão ÉS; Riccetto CLZ; Palma PCR
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(4):856-857. PubMed ID: 30735341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Balk EM; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):505-522. PubMed ID: 30741318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison between the vaginal patch plastron associated with the anterior sacrospinous fixation and the Uphold™ LITE vaginal support system for the treatment of advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
    Ferdinando Ruffolo A; Giordano C; Lambert B; Salvatore S; Lallemant M; Cosson M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Dec; 291():162-167. PubMed ID: 37898047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uterus-Sparing Surgery: Outcomes of Transvaginal Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy.
    Aserlind A; Garcia AN; Medina CA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32387566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
    Han JS; Zhang K; Zhu FL; Yao Y; Liang HM; Zhou LF; Guo HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21426766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Association between method of pelvic organ prolapse repair involving the vaginal apex and re-operation: a population-based, retrospective cohort study.
    Wu YM; Reid J; Chou Q; MacMillan B; Leong Y; Welk B
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):537-544. PubMed ID: 30327850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal Colposuspension Using the Uphold Lite Mesh System versus Transvaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treatment of Apical Prolapse: A Comparative Study.
    Chill HH; Navon I; Reuveni-Salzman A; Cohen A; Dick A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 28(10):1759-1764. PubMed ID: 33713835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomic outcomes after pelvic-organ-prolapse surgery: comparing uterine preservation with hysterectomy.
    Marschalek J; Trofaier ML; Yerlikaya G; Hanzal E; Koelbl H; Ott J; Umek W
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Dec; 183():33-6. PubMed ID: 25461349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
    Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 37.