270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30946779)
1. MedusaDock 2.0: Efficient and Accurate Protein-Ligand Docking With Constraints.
Wang J; Dokholyan NV
J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2509-2515. PubMed ID: 30946779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
Ding F; Dokholyan NV
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational protein-ligand docking and virtual drug screening with the AutoDock suite.
Forli S; Huey R; Pique ME; Sanner MF; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ
Nat Protoc; 2016 May; 11(5):905-19. PubMed ID: 27077332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advances in Docking.
Sulimov VB; Kutov DC; Sulimov AV
Curr Med Chem; 2019; 26(42):7555-7580. PubMed ID: 30182836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of protein-small molecule docking methods.
Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2002 Mar; 16(3):151-66. PubMed ID: 12363215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
Brylinski M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AutoDock and AutoDockTools for Protein-Ligand Docking: Beta-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1(BACE1) as a Case Study.
El-Hachem N; Haibe-Kains B; Khalil A; Kobeissy FH; Nemer G
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1598():391-403. PubMed ID: 28508374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Docking with GemDock.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():169-188. PubMed ID: 31452105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A scalable and accurate method for classifying protein-ligand binding geometries using a MapReduce approach.
Estrada T; Zhang B; Cicotti P; Armen RS; Taufer M
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jul; 42(7):758-71. PubMed ID: 22658682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Docking with SwissDock.
Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():189-202. PubMed ID: 31452106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. InstaDock: A single-click graphical user interface for molecular docking-based virtual high-throughput screening.
Mohammad T; Mathur Y; Hassan MI
Brief Bioinform; 2021 Jul; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 33105480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking.
Li H; Leung KS; Ballester PJ; Wong MH
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85678. PubMed ID: 24475049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Applications of the NRGsuite and the Molecular Docking Software FlexAID in Computational Drug Discovery and Design.
Morency LP; Gaudreault F; Najmanovich R
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1762():367-388. PubMed ID: 29594781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comprehensive assessment of flexible-ligand docking algorithms: current effectiveness and challenges.
Huang SY
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Sep; 19(5):982-994. PubMed ID: 28334282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Negative Image-Based Screening: Rigid Docking Using Cavity Information.
Postila PA; Kurkinen ST; Pentikäinen OT
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():125-140. PubMed ID: 33759124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FINDSITE
Zhou H; Cao H; Skolnick J
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Nov; 58(11):2343-2354. PubMed ID: 30278128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
