These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30946926)

  • 1. The effect of response complexity on simple reaction time occurs even with a highly predictable imperative stimulus.
    Maslovat D; Klapp ST; Forgaard CJ; Chua R; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jun; 704():62-66. PubMed ID: 30946926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Independent planning of timing and sequencing for complex movements.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Klapp ST; Franks IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1158-72. PubMed ID: 26882180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Control of response timing occurs during the simple reaction time interval but on-line for choice reaction time.
    Maslovat D; Klapp ST; Jagacinski RJ; Franks IM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):2005-21. PubMed ID: 25068697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preparation of timing structure involves two independent sub-processes.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Klapp ST; Franks IM
    Psychol Res; 2018 Sep; 82(5):981-996. PubMed ID: 28567604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli.
    Mattes S; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Oct; 59(7):1089-97. PubMed ID: 9360481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Motor preparation is modulated by the resolution of the response timing information.
    Carlsen AN; Mackinnon CD
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1322():38-49. PubMed ID: 20138165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of foreperiod duration on the preparation and control of sequential aiming movements.
    Khan MA; Kurniawan A; Khan ME; Khan MC; Smith KL; Scharoun Benson S; Carlsen AN; Lawrence GP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Feb; 77(2):242-256. PubMed ID: 36847427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of timing preparation during response initiation and execution using a startling acoustic stimulus.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Franks IM
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jan; 235(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 27614459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single pulse TMS during preparation for lower limb movement: Effect of task predictability on corticospinal excitability.
    Saumur TM; Mochizuki G
    Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 1697():105-112. PubMed ID: 30053404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The dual nature of time preparation: neural activation and suppression revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex.
    Davranche K; Tandonnet C; Burle B; Meynier C; Vidal F; Hasbroucq T
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Jun; 25(12):3766-74. PubMed ID: 17610596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The time course of corticospinal excitability during a simple reaction time task.
    Kennefick M; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113563. PubMed ID: 25406079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does the heart know what the eye sees? A cardiac/pupillometric analysis of motor preparation and response execution.
    van der Molen MW; Boomsma DI; Jennings JR; Nieuwboer RT
    Psychophysiology; 1989 Jan; 26(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 2922458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Revisiting variable-foreperiod effects: evaluating the repetition priming account.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 May; 84(4):1193-1207. PubMed ID: 35391659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Timeline of Motor Preparatory State Prior to Response Initiation: Evidence from Startle.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    Neuroscience; 2019 Jan; 397():80-93. PubMed ID: 30471355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does temporal predictability of tasks influence task choice?
    Jurczyk V; Mittelstädt V; Fröber K
    Psychol Res; 2021 Apr; 85(3):1066-1083. PubMed ID: 32067103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motor programming of finger sequences of different complexity.
    Leuthold H; Schröter H
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Jan; 86(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 20955758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of a neutral warning signal under increased temporal uncertainty.
    Han T; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1346-1357. PubMed ID: 36811693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preparatory inhibition of cortico-spinal excitability: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study in man.
    Hasbroucq T; Kaneko H; Akamatsu M; Possamaï CA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1997 Mar; 5(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 9088555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transfer effects in auditory temporal preparation occur using an unfilled but not filled foreperiod.
    Crowe EM; Los SA; Schindler L; Kent C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Aug; 74(8):1432-1438. PubMed ID: 33535929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reaction time changes with the hazard rate for a behaviorally relevant event when monkeys perform a delayed wrist movement task.
    Tsunoda Y; Kakei S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(2):152-7. PubMed ID: 18243554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.