These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. A new meta-analytic method for neuroimaging studies that combines reported peak coordinates and statistical parametric maps. Radua J; Mataix-Cols D; Phillips ML; El-Hage W; Kronhaus DM; Cardoner N; Surguladze S Eur Psychiatry; 2012 Nov; 27(8):605-11. PubMed ID: 21658917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying functional subdivisions in the human brain using meta-analytic activation modeling-based parcellation. Yang Y; Fan L; Chu C; Zhuo J; Wang J; Fox PT; Eickhoff SB; Jiang T Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):300-309. PubMed ID: 26296500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations. Woo CW; Krishnan A; Wager TD Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():412-9. PubMed ID: 24412399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False positive control of activated voxels in single fMRI analysis using bootstrap resampling in comparison to spatial smoothing. Darki F; Oghabian MA Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1331-7. PubMed ID: 23664823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A simple permutation-based test of intermodal correspondence. Weinstein SM; Vandekar SN; Adebimpe A; Tapera TM; Robert-Fitzgerald T; Gur RC; Gur RE; Raznahan A; Satterthwaite TD; Alexander-Bloch AF; Shinohara RT Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Nov; 42(16):5175-5187. PubMed ID: 34519385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Bayesian spatial model for neuroimaging data based on biologically informed basis functions. Huertas I; Oldehinkel M; van Oort ESB; Garcia-Solis D; Mir P; Beckmann CF; Marquand AF Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 161():134-148. PubMed ID: 28782681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What do results from coordinate-based meta-analyses tell us? Albajes-Eizagirre A; Radua J Neuroimage; 2018 Aug; 176():550-553. PubMed ID: 29729389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fighting or embracing multiplicity in neuroimaging? neighborhood leverage versus global calibration. Chen G; Taylor PA; Cox RW; Pessoa L Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 206():116320. PubMed ID: 31698079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A scalable multi-resolution spatio-temporal model for brain activation and connectivity in fMRI data. Castruccio S; Ombao H; Genton MG Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):823-833. PubMed ID: 29359375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peak p-values and false discovery rate inference in neuroimaging. Schwartzman A; Telschow F Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():402-413. PubMed ID: 31028923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. RichMind: A Tool for Improved Inference from Large-Scale Neuroimaging Results. Maron-Katz A; Amar D; Simon EB; Hendler T; Shamir R PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159643. PubMed ID: 27455041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjusting the neuroimaging statistical inferences for nonstationarity. Salimi-Khorshidi G; Smith SM; Nichols TE Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):992-9. PubMed ID: 20426085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhancing the reproducibility of group analysis with randomized brain parcellations. Da Mota B; Fritsch V; Varoquaux G; Frouin V; Poline JB; Thirion B Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 2):591-8. PubMed ID: 24579189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]