These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30946952)

  • 1. False-positive neuroimaging: Undisclosed flexibility in testing spatial hypotheses allows presenting anything as a replicated finding.
    Hong YW; Yoo Y; Han J; Wager TD; Woo CW
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 195():384-395. PubMed ID: 30946952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cluster-level statistical inference in fMRI datasets: The unexpected behavior of random fields in high dimensions.
    Bansal R; Peterson BS
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 49():101-115. PubMed ID: 29408478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Flexible annotation atlas of the mouse brain: combining and dividing brain structures of the Allen Brain Atlas while maintaining anatomical hierarchy.
    Takata N; Sato N; Komaki Y; Okano H; Tanaka KF
    Sci Rep; 2021 Mar; 11(1):6234. PubMed ID: 33737651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating spatial dependence into Bayesian multiple testing of statistical parametric maps in functional neuroimaging.
    Brown DA; Lazar NA; Datta GS; Jang W; McDowell JE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():97-112. PubMed ID: 23981437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving functional magnetic resonance imaging reproducibility.
    Pernet C; Poline JB
    Gigascience; 2015; 4():15. PubMed ID: 25830019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new meta-analytic method for neuroimaging studies that combines reported peak coordinates and statistical parametric maps.
    Radua J; Mataix-Cols D; Phillips ML; El-Hage W; Kronhaus DM; Cardoner N; Surguladze S
    Eur Psychiatry; 2012 Nov; 27(8):605-11. PubMed ID: 21658917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identifying functional subdivisions in the human brain using meta-analytic activation modeling-based parcellation.
    Yang Y; Fan L; Chu C; Zhuo J; Wang J; Fox PT; Eickhoff SB; Jiang T
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):300-309. PubMed ID: 26296500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cluster-extent based thresholding in fMRI analyses: pitfalls and recommendations.
    Woo CW; Krishnan A; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 91():412-9. PubMed ID: 24412399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False positive control of activated voxels in single fMRI analysis using bootstrap resampling in comparison to spatial smoothing.
    Darki F; Oghabian MA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1331-7. PubMed ID: 23664823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple permutation-based test of intermodal correspondence.
    Weinstein SM; Vandekar SN; Adebimpe A; Tapera TM; Robert-Fitzgerald T; Gur RC; Gur RE; Raznahan A; Satterthwaite TD; Alexander-Bloch AF; Shinohara RT
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Nov; 42(16):5175-5187. PubMed ID: 34519385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian spatial model for neuroimaging data based on biologically informed basis functions.
    Huertas I; Oldehinkel M; van Oort ESB; Garcia-Solis D; Mir P; Beckmann CF; Marquand AF
    Neuroimage; 2017 Nov; 161():134-148. PubMed ID: 28782681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What do results from coordinate-based meta-analyses tell us?
    Albajes-Eizagirre A; Radua J
    Neuroimage; 2018 Aug; 176():550-553. PubMed ID: 29729389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond linearity in neuroimaging: Capturing nonlinear relationships with application to longitudinal studies.
    Chen G; Nash TA; Cole KM; Kohn PD; Wei SM; Gregory MD; Eisenberg DP; Cox RW; Berman KF; Shane Kippenhan J
    Neuroimage; 2021 Jun; 233():117891. PubMed ID: 33667672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fighting or embracing multiplicity in neuroimaging? neighborhood leverage versus global calibration.
    Chen G; Taylor PA; Cox RW; Pessoa L
    Neuroimage; 2020 Feb; 206():116320. PubMed ID: 31698079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A scalable multi-resolution spatio-temporal model for brain activation and connectivity in fMRI data.
    Castruccio S; Ombao H; Genton MG
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):823-833. PubMed ID: 29359375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peak p-values and false discovery rate inference in neuroimaging.
    Schwartzman A; Telschow F
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():402-413. PubMed ID: 31028923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. RichMind: A Tool for Improved Inference from Large-Scale Neuroimaging Results.
    Maron-Katz A; Amar D; Simon EB; Hendler T; Shamir R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159643. PubMed ID: 27455041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adjusting the neuroimaging statistical inferences for nonstationarity.
    Salimi-Khorshidi G; Smith SM; Nichols TE
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 1):992-9. PubMed ID: 20426085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhancing the reproducibility of group analysis with randomized brain parcellations.
    Da Mota B; Fritsch V; Varoquaux G; Frouin V; Poline JB; Thirion B
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2013; 16(Pt 2):591-8. PubMed ID: 24579189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple testing correction over contrasts for brain imaging.
    Alberton BAV; Nichols TE; Gamba HR; Winkler AM
    Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116760. PubMed ID: 32201328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.