These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30947041)
21. Audibility, speech perception and processing of temporal cues in ribbon synaptic disorders due to OTOF mutations. Santarelli R; del Castillo I; Cama E; Scimemi P; Starr A Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt B):200-12. PubMed ID: 26188103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure. Kim JS; Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():304-315. PubMed ID: 30393003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs. Ramekers D; Benav H; Klis SFL; Versnel H J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):721-738. PubMed ID: 35948695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency. He S; Shahsavarani BS; McFayden TC; Wang H; Gill KE; Xu L; Chao X; Luo J; Wang R; He N Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):238-250. PubMed ID: 28678078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Acoustic-electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential. Nourski KV; Abbas PJ; Miller CA; Robinson BK; Jeng FC Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 232(1-2):87-103. PubMed ID: 17723284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users. Carlyon RP; Deeks JM Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():363-71. PubMed ID: 23716242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age. Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact of auditory nerve functional states on the correlations between human and computer decisions for electrically evoked compound action potential threshold. Li Q; Zhang C; Lu T; Xu C; Sun Z; Fan W; Wang Z; Li S Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109866. PubMed ID: 31945736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains. Runge-Samuelson CL; Abbas PJ; Rubinstein JT; Miller CA; Robinson BK Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves. Xu L; Skidmore J; Luo J; Chao X; Wang R; Wang H; He S Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1306-1319. PubMed ID: 32141933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Simulating electrical modulation detection thresholds using a biophysical model of the auditory nerve. O'Brien GE; Imennov NS; Rubinstein JT J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2448. PubMed ID: 27250141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use. Telmesani LM; Said NM Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Rubinstein JT; Wilson BS; Finley CC; Abbas PJ Hear Res; 1999 Jan; 127(1-2):108-18. PubMed ID: 9925022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Systematic review of compound action potentials as predictors for cochlear implant performance. van Eijl RH; Buitenhuis PJ; Stegeman I; Klis SF; Grolman W Laryngoscope; 2017 Feb; 127(2):476-487. PubMed ID: 27804133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants. Vischer M; Haenggeli A; Zhang J; Pelizzone M; Häusler R; Rouiller EM Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve. He S; Xu L; Skidmore J; Chao X; Riggs WJ; Wang R; Vaughan C; Luo J; Shannon M; Warner C Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1606-1618. PubMed ID: 33136636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Age-Related Changes in Temporal Resolution Revisited: Electrophysiological and Behavioral Findings From Cochlear Implant Users. Mussoi BSS; Brown CJ Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1328-1344. PubMed ID: 31033701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception. Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Characterizing Polarity Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Demographic Effects and Potential Implications for Estimating Neural Health. Hughes ML J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Apr; 23(2):301-318. PubMed ID: 34988867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds. Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]