123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30947186)
41. Evaluation of the category high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in The Bethesda System for reporting cervical cytology.
Mukhopadhyay S; Ray S; Dhar S; Bandyopadhyay R; Sinha SK
J Cytol; 2013 Jan; 30(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 23661938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Predictive Factors Involved in Postpartum Regressions of Cytological/Histological Cervical High-Grade Dysplasia Diagnosed during Pregnancy.
Gomez Y; Balaya V; Lepigeon K; Mathevet P; Jacot-Guillarmod M
J Clin Med; 2021 Nov; 10(22):. PubMed ID: 34830596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Raman microspectroscopy for the early detection of pre-malignant changes in cervical tissue.
Rashid N; Nawaz H; Poon KW; Bonnier F; Bakhiet S; Martin C; O'Leary JJ; Byrne HJ; Lyng FM
Exp Mol Pathol; 2014 Dec; 97(3):554-64. PubMed ID: 25445502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Liquid based cytology improves the positive predictive value of glandular smears compared to conventional cytology.
Edmondson RJ; Errington CA; Mansour DJ
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2010; 31(3):288-90. PubMed ID: 21077470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Cytohistological correlation of endocervical gland involvement with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Kir G; Karabulut M; Yilmaz M; Topal C; Gocmen A
J Cytol; 2012 Apr; 29(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 22787292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A case of placental site nodule associated with cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Giordano G; Manuguerra R; Varotti E; Brigati F
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016; 37(2):259-61. PubMed ID: 27172758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Predictive value of 'Smartscopy' for the detection of preinvasive cervical lesions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a diagnostic study.
Phoblap T; Temtanakitpaisan A; Aue-Angkul A; Kleebkaow P; Chumworathayi B; Luanratanakorn S; Itarat Y
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2022 Sep; 65(5):451-458. PubMed ID: 35902246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy as a quantitative diagnostic tool for assignment of premalignancy grading in cervical neoplasia.
Mark S; Sahu RK; Kantarovich K; Podshyvalov A; Guterman H; Goldstein J; Jagannathan R; Argov S; Mordechai S
J Biomed Opt; 2004; 9(3):558-67. PubMed ID: 15189094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Histology verification demonstrates that biospectroscopy analysis of cervical cytology identifies underlying disease more accurately than conventional screening: removing the confounder of discordance.
Gajjar K; Ahmadzai AA; Valasoulis G; Trevisan J; Founta C; Nasioutziki M; Loufopoulos A; Kyrgiou M; Stasinou SM; Karakitsos P; Paraskevaidis E; Da Gama-Rose B; Martin-Hirsch PL; Martin FL
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e82416. PubMed ID: 24404130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Multi-center clinical study using optical coherence tomography for evaluation of cervical lesions in-vivo.
Ren C; Zeng X; Shi Z; Wang C; Wang H; Wang X; Zhang B; Jiang Z; Ma H; Hu H; Piao H; Zhang X; Wang B
Sci Rep; 2021 Apr; 11(1):7507. PubMed ID: 33820924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Validation of claims-based algorithms for identification of high-grade cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer.
Kim SC; Gillet VG; Feldman S; Lii H; Toh S; Brown JS; Katz JN; Solomon DH; Schneeweiss S
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Nov; 22(11):1239-44. PubMed ID: 24027140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Feasibility and Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Sponge Cytology for Community-Based Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Screening in China.
Gao Y; Xin L; Feng YD; Yao B; Lin H; Sun C; An W; Li ZS; Shi RH; Wang LW
Am J Gastroenterol; 2021 Nov; 116(11):2207-2215. PubMed ID: 34546186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53.
Huang J; Gao H; Tan HZ
Front Genet; 2020; 11():633. PubMed ID: 32849763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of oral brush liquid-based cytology for oral squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative study of cytological and histological diagnoses at a single center.
Kokubun K; Nakajima K; Yamamoto K; Akashi Y; Matsuzaka K
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):145. PubMed ID: 36906554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. An Update on Prenatal Diethylstilbestrol Exposure and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the Lower Genital Tract.
Troisi R; Bertrand K; Hatch EE; Strohsnitter WC; Aagaard K; Robboy SJ; Gierach G; Titus L
Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 143(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 38422500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. MOLECULAR MARKERS OF EARLY CERVICAL NEOPLASIA.
Pinto AP; Crum CP; Hirsch MS
Diagn Histopathol (Oxf); 2010 Oct; 16(10):445-454. PubMed ID: 21076641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Cervical HSIL Involving the Endometrium and Adenomyosis: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Wang W; Zhou F
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2021 Mar; 31(3):337-339. PubMed ID: 33775028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Role of microRNAs as biomarkers of cervical carcinogenesis: a systematic review.
Nagandla K; Lin KH; Chitra E; Jamli MFBM
Obstet Gynecol Sci; 2021 Sep; 64(5):419-436. PubMed ID: 34384196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Placental Site Plaque of the Uterine Cervix Misinterpreted as Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion in Liquid-Based Cervicovaginal Cytology: Usefulness of Inhibin-α Immunocytochemistry.
Kim H; Woo HY; Lee SH; Do SI; Kim HS
Case Rep Oncol; 2020; 13(3):1415-1420. PubMed ID: 33442365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Quantitative analysis of abnormalities in gynecologic cytopathology with deep learning.
Ke J; Shen Y; Lu Y; Deng J; Wright JD; Zhang Y; Huang Q; Wang D; Jing N; Liang X; Jiang F
Lab Invest; 2021 Apr; 101(4):513-524. PubMed ID: 33526806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
