349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30947688)
1. Marker genes as predictors of shared genomic function.
Sevigny JL; Rothenheber D; Diaz KS; Zhang Y; Agustsson K; Bergeron RD; Thomas WK
BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):268. PubMed ID: 30947688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences.
Langille MG; Zaneveld J; Caporaso JG; McDonald D; Knights D; Reyes JA; Clemente JC; Burkepile DE; Vega Thurber RL; Knight R; Beiko RG; Huttenhower C
Nat Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):814-21. PubMed ID: 23975157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing.
Ogier JC; Pagès S; Galan M; Barret M; Gaudriault S
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):171. PubMed ID: 31357928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amplicon Sequence Variants Artificially Split Bacterial Genomes into Separate Clusters.
Schloss PD
mSphere; 2021 Aug; 6(4):e0019121. PubMed ID: 34287003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The concept of operational taxonomic units revisited: genomes of bacteria that are regarded as closely related are often highly dissimilar.
Lladó Fernández S; Větrovský T; Baldrian P
Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2019 Jan; 64(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29926341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of reduced metagenome and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for determination of genetic diversity and mother-child overlap of the gut associated microbiota.
Ravi A; Avershina E; Angell IL; Ludvigsen J; Manohar P; Padmanaban S; Nachimuthu R; Snipen L; Rudi K
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jun; 149():44-52. PubMed ID: 29501688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deciphering intra-species bacterial diversity of meat and seafood spoilage microbiota using gyrB amplicon sequencing: A comparative analysis with 16S rDNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing.
Poirier S; Rué O; Peguilhan R; Coeuret G; Zagorec M; Champomier-Vergès MC; Loux V; Chaillou S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204629. PubMed ID: 30252901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amplicon Sequencing of Single-Copy Protein-Coding Genes Reveals Accurate Diversity for Sequence-Discrete Microbiome Populations.
Yang C; Su Q; Tang M; Luo S; Zheng H; Zhang X; Zhou X
Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0210521. PubMed ID: 35416715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data.
Aßhauer KP; Wemheuer B; Daniel R; Meinicke P
Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2882-4. PubMed ID: 25957349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using 16S rRNA gene as marker to detect unknown bacteria in microbial communities.
Tran Q; Pham DT; Phan V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 14):499. PubMed ID: 29297282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ezTree: an automated pipeline for identifying phylogenetic marker genes and inferring evolutionary relationships among uncultivated prokaryotic draft genomes.
Wu YW
BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(Suppl 1):921. PubMed ID: 29363425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marker genes that are less conserved in their sequences are useful for predicting genome-wide similarity levels between closely related prokaryotic strains.
Lan Y; Rosen G; Hershberg R
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):18. PubMed ID: 27138046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes as molecular markers for microbial ecology studies.
Case RJ; Boucher Y; Dahllöf I; Holmström C; Doolittle WF; Kjelleberg S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 73(1):278-88. PubMed ID: 17071787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-resolution microbiome analysis enabled by linking of 16S rRNA gene sequences with adjacent genomic contexts.
Kapustina Ž; Medžiūnė J; Alzbutas G; Rokaitis I; Matjošaitis K; Mackevičius G; Žeimytė S; Karpus L; Lubys A
Microb Genom; 2021 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 34473015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Taxa-function robustness in microbial communities.
Eng A; Borenstein E
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):45. PubMed ID: 29499759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem.
Louca S; Doebeli M; Parfrey LW
Microbiome; 2018 Feb; 6(1):41. PubMed ID: 29482646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbial Diversity Biased Estimation Caused by Intragenomic Heterogeneity and Interspecific Conservation of 16S rRNA Genes.
Pan P; Gu Y; Sun DL; Wu QL; Zhou NY
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2023 May; 89(5):e0210822. PubMed ID: 37129483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses.
Větrovský T; Baldrian P
PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57923. PubMed ID: 23460914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computational integration of genomic traits into 16S rDNA microbiota sequencing studies.
Keller A; Horn H; Förster F; Schultz J
Gene; 2014 Oct; 549(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 25084126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing bacterial communities inferred from 16S rRNA gene sequencing and shotgun metagenomics.
Shah N; Tang H; Doak TG; Ye Y
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2011; ():165-76. PubMed ID: 21121044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
