These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing. Ogier JC; Pagès S; Galan M; Barret M; Gaudriault S BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):171. PubMed ID: 31357928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amplicon Sequence Variants Artificially Split Bacterial Genomes into Separate Clusters. Schloss PD mSphere; 2021 Aug; 6(4):e0019121. PubMed ID: 34287003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The concept of operational taxonomic units revisited: genomes of bacteria that are regarded as closely related are often highly dissimilar. Lladó Fernández S; Větrovský T; Baldrian P Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2019 Jan; 64(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29926341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of reduced metagenome and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for determination of genetic diversity and mother-child overlap of the gut associated microbiota. Ravi A; Avershina E; Angell IL; Ludvigsen J; Manohar P; Padmanaban S; Nachimuthu R; Snipen L; Rudi K J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jun; 149():44-52. PubMed ID: 29501688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deciphering intra-species bacterial diversity of meat and seafood spoilage microbiota using gyrB amplicon sequencing: A comparative analysis with 16S rDNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing. Poirier S; Rué O; Peguilhan R; Coeuret G; Zagorec M; Champomier-Vergès MC; Loux V; Chaillou S PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204629. PubMed ID: 30252901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Amplicon Sequencing of Single-Copy Protein-Coding Genes Reveals Accurate Diversity for Sequence-Discrete Microbiome Populations. Yang C; Su Q; Tang M; Luo S; Zheng H; Zhang X; Zhou X Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0210521. PubMed ID: 35416715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data. Aßhauer KP; Wemheuer B; Daniel R; Meinicke P Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 31(17):2882-4. PubMed ID: 25957349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using 16S rRNA gene as marker to detect unknown bacteria in microbial communities. Tran Q; Pham DT; Phan V BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 14):499. PubMed ID: 29297282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ezTree: an automated pipeline for identifying phylogenetic marker genes and inferring evolutionary relationships among uncultivated prokaryotic draft genomes. Wu YW BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(Suppl 1):921. PubMed ID: 29363425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marker genes that are less conserved in their sequences are useful for predicting genome-wide similarity levels between closely related prokaryotic strains. Lan Y; Rosen G; Hershberg R Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):18. PubMed ID: 27138046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of 16S rRNA and rpoB genes as molecular markers for microbial ecology studies. Case RJ; Boucher Y; Dahllöf I; Holmström C; Doolittle WF; Kjelleberg S Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 73(1):278-88. PubMed ID: 17071787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Taxa-function robustness in microbial communities. Eng A; Borenstein E Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):45. PubMed ID: 29499759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. Louca S; Doebeli M; Parfrey LW Microbiome; 2018 Feb; 6(1):41. PubMed ID: 29482646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbial Diversity Biased Estimation Caused by Intragenomic Heterogeneity and Interspecific Conservation of 16S rRNA Genes. Pan P; Gu Y; Sun DL; Wu QL; Zhou NY Appl Environ Microbiol; 2023 May; 89(5):e0210822. PubMed ID: 37129483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses. Větrovský T; Baldrian P PLoS One; 2013; 8(2):e57923. PubMed ID: 23460914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]