These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30947919)

  • 1. Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Tehrani BN; Truesdell AG; Sherwood MW; Desai S; Tran HA; Epps KC; Singh R; Psotka M; Shah P; Cooper LB; Rosner C; Raja A; Barnett SD; Saulino P; deFilippi CR; Gurbel PA; Murphy CE; O'Connor CM
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Apr; 73(13):1659-1669. PubMed ID: 30947919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Cardiac ICUs With Versus Without Shock Teams.
    Papolos AI; Kenigsberg BB; Berg DD; Alviar CL; Bohula E; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Drakos S; Gerber DA; Guo J; Horowitz JM; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Metkus TS; Nativi-Nicolau J; Snell JR; Sinha SS; Tymchak WJ; Van Diepen S; Morrow DA; Barnett CF;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 78(13):1309-1317. PubMed ID: 34556316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: Shock Team or Bust?
    Kim DH
    Can J Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 36(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 32036864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Value of Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support.
    Saxena A; Garan AR; Kapur NK; O'Neill WW; Lindenfeld J; Pinney SP; Uriel N; Burkhoff D; Kern M
    Circulation; 2020 Apr; 141(14):1184-1197. PubMed ID: 32250695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Initial outcomes of a multidisciplinary network for the care of patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Hernández-Pérez FJ; Álvarez-Avelló JM; Forteza A; Gómez-Bueno M; González A; López-Ibor JV; Silva-Melchor L; Goicolea J; Martín CE; Iranzo R; Goirigolzarri-Artaza J; Escudier-Villa JM; Ortega-Marcos J; Oteo-Domínguez JF; Herrero-Cano Á; Moñivas V; Mingo-Santos S; Villar S; Jiménez-Blanco M; Coscia C; Serrano-Fiz S; Alonso-Pulpón L; Segovia-Cubero J
    Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2021 Jan; 74(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 32448727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implementation of a Cardiogenic Shock Team and Clinical Outcomes (INOVA-SHOCK Registry): Observational and Retrospective Study.
    Tehrani B; Truesdell A; Singh R; Murphy C; Saulino P
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2018 Jun; 7(6):e160. PubMed ID: 29954728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Risk Stratification for Patients in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Pöss J; Köster J; Fuernau G; Eitel I; de Waha S; Ouarrak T; Lassus J; Harjola VP; Zeymer U; Thiele H; Desch S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 69(15):1913-1920. PubMed ID: 28408020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cardiogenic shock teams and centres: a contemporary review of multidisciplinary care for cardiogenic shock.
    Moghaddam N; van Diepen S; So D; Lawler PR; Fordyce CB
    ESC Heart Fail; 2021 Apr; 8(2):988-998. PubMed ID: 33452763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A team-based approach to patients in cardiogenic shock.
    Doll JA; Ohman EM; Patel MR; Milano CA; Rogers JG; Wohns DH; Kapur NK; Rao SV
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 88(3):424-33. PubMed ID: 26526563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical circulatory support in patients with cardiogenic shock in intensive care units: A position paper of the "Unité de Soins Intensifs de Cardiologie" group of the French Society of Cardiology, endorsed by the "Groupe Athérome et Cardiologie Interventionnelle" of the French Society of Cardiology.
    Bonello L; Delmas C; Schurtz G; Leurent G; Bonnefoy E; Aissaoui N; Henry P
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018 Oct; 111(10):601-612. PubMed ID: 29903693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of cardiogenic shock hospital volume on mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Shaefi S; O'Gara B; Kociol RD; Joynt K; Mueller A; Nizamuddin J; Mahmood E; Talmor D; Shahul S
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2015 Jan; 4(1):e001462. PubMed ID: 25559014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and hemodynamic effects of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in chronic heart failure patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Fried JA; Nair A; Takeda K; Clerkin K; Topkara VK; Masoumi A; Yuzefpolskaya M; Takayama H; Naka Y; Burkhoff D; Kirtane A; Karmpaliotis D; Moses J; Colombo PC; Garan AR
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2018 Nov; 37(11):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 29678608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shock Team Approach in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Short-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Proof of Concept.
    Taleb I; Koliopoulou AG; Tandar A; McKellar SH; Tonna JE; Nativi-Nicolau J; Alvarez Villela M; Welt F; Stehlik J; Gilbert EM; Wever-Pinzon O; Morshedzadeh JH; Dranow E; Selzman CH; Fang JC; Drakos SG
    Circulation; 2019 Jul; 140(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 31549877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Building a cardiogenic shock response team: key considerations necessary to improve outcomes.
    Varma B; Katz JN; Alviar CL
    Curr Opin Crit Care; 2024 Aug; 30(4):354-361. PubMed ID: 38872365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Short and intermediate term clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with aortic counterpulsation].
    Fornaro G; Prando MD; Parodi F; Cordero G; Sansa M; Bongo AS; Campi A; Aralda D; Dellavesa P; Aina F; Lazzero M; Cernigliaro C
    G Ital Cardiol; 1996 Dec; 26(12):1385-99. PubMed ID: 9162668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of survival and ability to wean from short-term mechanical circulatory support device following acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Garan AR; Eckhardt C; Takeda K; Topkara VK; Clerkin K; Fried J; Masoumi A; Demmer RT; Trinh P; Yuzefpolskaya M; Naka Y; Burkhoff D; Kirtane A; Colombo PC; Takayama H
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2018 Dec; 7(8):755-765. PubMed ID: 29094607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in Heart Failure With and Without Cardiogenic Shock.
    Hernandez GA; Lemor A; Blumer V; Rueda CA; Zalawadiya S; Stevenson LW; Lindenfeld J
    J Card Fail; 2019 May; 25(5):364-371. PubMed ID: 30858119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.
    Ouweneel DM; Eriksen E; Sjauw KD; van Dongen IM; Hirsch A; Packer EJ; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2017 Jan; 69(3):278-287. PubMed ID: 27810347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.