These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30947938)

  • 1. 7-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Comparing the First-Generation Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus the New-Generation Everolimus-Eluting Stent: The RESET Trial.
    Shiomi H; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Akasaka T; Abe M; Takeji Y; Suwa S; Ito Y; Kobayashi M; Dai K; Nakao K; Tarutani Y; Taniguchi R; Nishikawa H; Yamamoto Y; Nakagawa Y; Ando K; Kobayashi K; Kawai K; Hibi K; Kimura T;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(7):637-647. PubMed ID: 30947938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(11):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 32499026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
    Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.
    Yamaji K; Zanchin T; Zanchin C; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Hunziker L; Praz F; Blöchlinger S; Moro C; Moschovitis A; Seiler C; Valgimigli M; Billinger M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006741. PubMed ID: 30354590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
    Kufner S; Joner M; Thannheimer A; Hoppmann P; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Cassese S; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Byrne RA;
    Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(3):325-333. PubMed ID: 30586724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized Multicenter Trial Investigating Angiographic Outcomes of Hybrid Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Compared With Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Chronic Total Occlusions: The PRISON IV Trial.
    Teeuwen K; van der Schaaf RJ; Adriaenssens T; Koolen JJ; Smits PC; Henriques JP; Vermeersch PH; Tjon Joe Gin RM; Schölzel BE; Kelder JC; Tijssen JG; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jan; 10(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 28104206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes in multivessel coronary artery disease patients treated either with bioresoarbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent or permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 5-year results of the CENTURY II randomized clinical trial.
    Iñiguez A; Chevalier B; Richardt G; Neylon A; Jiménez VA; Kornowski R; Carrie D; Moreno R; Barbato E; Serra-Peñaranda A; Guiducci V; Valdés-Chávarri M; Yajima J; Wijns W; Saito S;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):175-184. PubMed ID: 31033154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
    Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-year outcomes after revascularization with everolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents from the SORT OUT IV trial.
    Jensen LO; Thayssen P; Maeng M; Christiansen EH; Ravkilde J; Hansen KN; Kaltoft A; Tilsted HH; Madsen M; Lassen JF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):840-8. PubMed ID: 25086842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 5-Year Outcome Following Randomized Treatment of All-Comers With Zotarolimus-Eluting Resolute Integrity and Everolimus-Eluting PROMUS Element Coronary Stents: Final Report of the DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II) Trial.
    Zocca P; Kok MM; Tandjung K; Danse PW; Jessurun GAJ; Hautvast RWM; van Houwelingen KG; Stoel MG; Schramm AR; Tjon Joe Gin RM; de Man FHAF; Hartmann M; Louwerenburg JHW; Linssen GCM; Löwik MM; Doggen CJM; von Birgelen C
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 11(5):462-469. PubMed ID: 29519378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 10-month angiographic and 4-year clinical outcome of everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting coronary stents in patients with diabetes mellitus (the DiabeDES IV randomized angiography trial).
    Maeng M; Baranauskas A; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Holm NR; Krusell LR; Ravkilde J; Tilsted HH; Thayssen P; Jensen LO
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 86(7):1161-7. PubMed ID: 25640050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-Term Effect of Ultrathin-Strut Versus Thin-Strut Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Subgroup Analysis of the BIOSCIENCE Randomized Trial.
    Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Noble S; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Häner J; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 12(8):e008024. PubMed ID: 31525083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Second-versus first-generation "Limus"-eluting stents in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease: a randomized comparison in setting of ISAR-TEST-4 trial.
    Kufner S; Byrne RA; Mehilli J; Massberg S; Birkmeier KA; Schulz S; Pache J; Schömig A; Kastrati A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(6):E769-76. PubMed ID: 23754254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting coronary stents: 1-year outcomes from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting Versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial (RESET).
    Kimura T; Morimoto T; Natsuaki M; Shiomi H; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Akasaka T; Takatsu Y; Nishikawa H; Yamamoto Y; Nakagawa Y; Hayashi Y; Iwabuchi M; Umeda H; Kawai K; Okada H; Kimura K; Simonton CA; Kozuma K;
    Circulation; 2012 Sep; 126(10):1225-36. PubMed ID: 22824435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Everolimus-Eluting Versus Biolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymers in Unselected Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial With 1-Year Follow-Up (SORT OUT VIII Trial).
    Maeng M; Christiansen EH; Raungaard B; Kahlert J; Terkelsen CJ; Kristensen SD; Carstensen S; Aarøe J; Jensen SE; Villadsen AB; Lassen JF; Thim T; Eftekhari A; Veien KT; Hansen KN; Junker A; Bøtker HE; Jensen LO;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Apr; 12(7):624-633. PubMed ID: 30947936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of everolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: final 3-year results of the SPIRIT clinical trials program (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).
    Dangas GD; Serruys PW; Kereiakes DJ; Hermiller J; Rizvi A; Newman W; Sudhir K; Smith RS; Cao S; Theodoropoulos K; Cutlip DE; Lansky AJ; Stone GW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 6(9):914-22. PubMed ID: 24050859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: RACES-MI trial.
    Di Lorenzo E; Sauro R; Varricchio A; Capasso M; Lanzillo T; Manganelli F; Carbone G; Lanni F; Pagliuca MR; Stanco G; Rosato G; Suryapranata H; De Luca G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Aug; 7(8):849-56. PubMed ID: 25147029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thin, Very Thin, or Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable or Durable Polymer-Coated Drug-Eluting Stents: 3-Year Outcomes of BIO-RESORT.
    Buiten RA; Ploumen EH; Zocca P; Doggen CJM; Danse PW; Schotborgh CE; Scholte M; van Houwelingen KG; Stoel MG; Hartmann M; Tjon Joe Gin RM; Somi S; Linssen GCM; Kok MM; von Birgelen C
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(17):1650-1660. PubMed ID: 31422087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 3-Year Clinical Follow-Up of the RIBS IV Clinical Trial: A Prospective Randomized Study of Drug-Eluting Balloons Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With In-Stent Restenosis in Coronary Arteries Previously Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents.
    Alfonso F; Pérez-Vizcayno MJ; Cuesta J; García Del Blanco B; García-Touchard A; López-Mínguez JR; Masotti M; Zueco J; Cequier A; Velázquez M; Moreno R; Mainar V; Domínguez A; Moris C; Molina E; Rivero F; Jiménez-Quevedo P; Gonzalo N; Fernández-Pérez C;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 May; 11(10):981-991. PubMed ID: 29798776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.