These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30949446)
1. Leveraging Spatial Variation in Tumor Purity for Improved Somatic Variant Calling of Archival Tumor Only Samples. Halperin RF; Liang WS; Kulkarni S; Tassone EE; Adkins J; Enriquez D; Tran NL; Hank NC; Newell J; Kodira C; Korn R; Berens ME; Kim S; Byron SA Front Oncol; 2019; 9():119. PubMed ID: 30949446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A method to reduce ancestry related germline false positives in tumor only somatic variant calling. Halperin RF; Carpten JD; Manojlovic Z; Aldrich J; Keats J; Byron S; Liang WS; Russell M; Enriquez D; Claasen A; Cherni I; Awuah B; Oppong J; Wicha MS; Newman LA; Jaigge E; Kim S; Craig DW BMC Med Genomics; 2017 Oct; 10(1):61. PubMed ID: 29052513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations. Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PureCN: copy number calling and SNV classification using targeted short read sequencing. Riester M; Singh AP; Brannon AR; Yu K; Campbell CD; Chiang DY; Morrissey MP Source Code Biol Med; 2016; 11():13. PubMed ID: 27999612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. TOSCA: an automated Tumor Only Somatic CAlling workflow for somatic mutation detection without matched normal samples. Del Corvo M; Mazzara S; Pileri SA Bioinform Adv; 2022; 2(1):vbac070. PubMed ID: 36699358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data. Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing. Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. multiSNV: a probabilistic approach for improving detection of somatic point mutations from multiple related tumour samples. Josephidou M; Lynch AG; Tavaré S Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 May; 43(9):e61. PubMed ID: 25722372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data. Chang TC; Xu K; Cheng Z; Wu G Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1361():37-54. PubMed ID: 35230682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal. Sun JX; He Y; Sanford E; Montesion M; Frampton GM; Vignot S; Soria JC; Ross JS; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Lipson D; Yelensky R PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005965. PubMed ID: 29415044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. FFPE breast tumour blocks provide reliable sources of both germline and malignant DNA for investigation of genetic determinants of individual tumour responses to treatment. Wilkins A; Chauhan R; Rust A; Pearson A; Daley F; Manodoro F; Fenwick K; Bliss J; Yarnold J; Somaiah N Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Aug; 170(3):573-581. PubMed ID: 29700676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis. Pei S; Liu T; Ren X; Li W; Chen C; Xie Z Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32698196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SomVarIUS: somatic variant identification from unpaired tissue samples. Smith KS; Yadav VK; Pei S; Pollyea DA; Jordan CT; De S Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 32(6):808-13. PubMed ID: 26589277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]