These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30949925)
21. Amygdala lesions selectively impair familiarity in recognition memory. Farovik A; Place RJ; Miller DR; Eichenbaum H Nat Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 14(11):1416-7. PubMed ID: 21946327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Damage to the lateral prefrontal cortex impairs familiarity but not recollection. Aly M; Yonelinas AP; Kishiyama MM; Knight RT Behav Brain Res; 2011 Nov; 225(1):297-304. PubMed ID: 21827792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Unitization does not impede overall item recognition performance: Behavioral and event-related potential study. Liu Z; Wu J; Wang Y; Guo C Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Jan; 167():107130. PubMed ID: 31786310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Not all performance validity tests are created equal: The role of recollection and familiarity in the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test. Eglit GM; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Mar; 39(2):173-189. PubMed ID: 27501116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Probing emotional recognition memory: how different response formats affect response behaviour. Sommer T; Schröter R; Bayer J Memory; 2021 Oct; 29(9):1216-1231. PubMed ID: 34486950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Could masked conceptual primes increase recollection? The subtleties of measuring recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Taylor JR; Henson RN Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3027-40. PubMed ID: 22898644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ROC curves and confidence judgements in recognition memory. Van Zandt T J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 May; 26(3):582-600. PubMed ID: 10855419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Probability of target recollection varies with target-lure relatedness under the dual process signal detection model. Dopkins S; Galyer D Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Oct; 201():102933. PubMed ID: 31739089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Recollection and familiarity in schizophrenia: a quantitative review. Libby LA; Yonelinas AP; Ranganath C; Ragland JD Biol Psychiatry; 2013 May; 73(10):944-50. PubMed ID: 23245761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Components of episodic memory: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Yonelinas AP Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2001 Sep; 356(1413):1363-74. PubMed ID: 11571028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Memorial familiarity remains intact for pictures but not for words in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Embree LM; Budson AE; Ally BA Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2333-40. PubMed ID: 22705441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Manipulating the depth of processing reveals the relevance of second eye fixations for recollection but not familiarity. Schwedes C; Scherer D; Wentura D Psychol Res; 2020 Nov; 84(8):2237-2247. PubMed ID: 31236764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cognitive aging: a common decline of episodic recollection and spatial memory in rats. Robitsek RJ; Fortin NJ; Koh MT; Gallagher M; Eichenbaum H J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(36):8945-54. PubMed ID: 18768688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dynamics of brain activity reveal a unitary recognition signal. Weidemann CT; Kahana MJ J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):440-451. PubMed ID: 30024265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments. Evans LH; Wilding EL J Neurosci; 2012 May; 32(21):7253-7. PubMed ID: 22623670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity. Kirwan CB; Wixted JT; Squire LR Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Jan; 107(1):344-8. PubMed ID: 19966306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Recollection is a continuous process: Evidence from plurality memory receiver operating characteristics. Slotnick SD; Jeye BM; Dodson CS Memory; 2016; 24(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 25354207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Individual differences in forced-choice recognition memory: partitioning contributions of recollection and familiarity. Migo EM; Quamme JR; Holmes S; Bendell A; Norman KA; Mayes AR; Montaldi D Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2189-206. PubMed ID: 24796268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation. Arndt J; Reder LM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):830-42. PubMed ID: 12219793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Amount, not strength of recollection, drives hippocampal activity: A problem for apparent word familiarity-related hippocampal activation. Mayes AR; Montaldi D; Roper A; Migo EM; Gholipour T; Kafkas A Hippocampus; 2019 Jan; 29(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 30411437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]