These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30950697)

  • 1. The Production of Question Intonation by Young Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Does Age at Implantation Matter?
    Lehnert-LeHouillier H; Spencer LJ; Machmer EL; Burchell KL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Feb; 62(2):257-271. PubMed ID: 30950697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of speech intonation production and perception abilities of Farsi speaking cochlear implanted and normal hearing children.
    Moein N; Khoddami SM; Shahbodaghi MR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():1-6. PubMed ID: 28964276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination of intonation contours by adolescents with cochlear implants.
    Holt CM; McDermott HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):808-15. PubMed ID: 24053225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Production and perception of speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients and individuals with normal hearing.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Turner CW
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):336-51. PubMed ID: 18344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech intonation and melodic contour recognition in children with cochlear implants and with normal hearing.
    See RL; Driscoll VD; Gfeller K; Kliethermes S; Oleson J
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):490-8. PubMed ID: 23442568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech prosody perception in cochlear implant users with and without residual hearing.
    Marx M; James C; Foxton J; Capber A; Fraysse B; Barone P; Deguine O
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):239-48. PubMed ID: 25303861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of Cantonese Lexical Tones by Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users.
    Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 61(1):174-185. PubMed ID: 29344625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Production of sentence-final intonation contours by hearing-impaired children.
    Allen GD; Arndorfer PM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Apr; 43(2):441-55. PubMed ID: 10757695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Imitative production of rising speech intonation in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.
    Peng SC; Tomblin JB; Spencer LJ; Hurtig RR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Oct; 50(5):1210-27. PubMed ID: 17905907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The perception of stress and intonation in children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid.
    Hegarty L; Faulkner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Nov; 14 Suppl 4():S35-9. PubMed ID: 24533762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Age and Unaided Acoustic Hearing on Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users' Ability to Distinguish Yes/No Statements and Questions.
    Buss E; Richter ME; Sweeney VN; Davis AG; Dillon MT; Park LR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 67(6):1932-1944. PubMed ID: 38748909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of spectral smearing on the identification of pure F0 intonation contours in vocoder simulations of cochlear implants.
    van de Velde DJ; Dritsakis G; Frijns JH; van Heuven VJ; Schiller NO
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 25001247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of various electrode configurations on music perception, intonation and speaker gender identification.
    Landwehr M; Fürstenberg D; Walger M; von Wedel H; Meister H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 23684531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
    Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing F0 with cochlear implants: Modulation frequency discrimination and speech intonation recognition.
    Chatterjee M; Peng SC
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan; 235(1-2):143-56. PubMed ID: 18093766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
    Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
    Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.