144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30951082)
21. Genomic prediction applied to multiple traits and environments in second season maize hybrids.
de Oliveira AA; Resende MFR; Ferrão LFV; Amadeu RR; Guimarães LJM; Guimarães CT; Pastina MM; Margarido GRA
Heredity (Edinb); 2020 Aug; 125(1-2):60-72. PubMed ID: 32472060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genomic prediction of hybrid performance for agronomic traits in sorghum.
Sapkota S; Boatwright JL; Kumar N; Myers M; Cox A; Ackerman A; Caughman W; Brenton ZW; Boyles RE; Kresovich S
G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Apr; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 36454599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Genomic-Enabled Prediction Kernel Models with Random Intercepts for Multi-environment Trials.
Cuevas J; Granato I; Fritsche-Neto R; Montesinos-Lopez OA; Burgueño J; Bandeira E Sousa M; Crossa J
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Mar; 8(4):1347-1365. PubMed ID: 29476023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genomic Prediction of Barley Hybrid Performance.
Philipp N; Liu G; Zhao Y; He S; Spiller M; Stiewe G; Pillen K; Reif JC; Li Z
Plant Genome; 2016 Jul; 9(2):. PubMed ID: 27898835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Genome-based trait prediction in multi- environment breeding trials in groundnut.
Pandey MK; Chaudhari S; Jarquin D; Janila P; Crossa J; Patil SC; Sundravadana S; Khare D; Bhat RS; Radhakrishnan T; Hickey JM; Varshney RK
Theor Appl Genet; 2020 Nov; 133(11):3101-3117. PubMed ID: 32809035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Potential use of molecular markers for prediction of genotypic values in hybrid maize performance.
Balestre M; Von Pinho RG; Souza JC; Oliveira RL
Genet Mol Res; 2009 Oct; 8(4):1292-306. PubMed ID: 19876871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Increased Prediction Accuracy Using Combined Genomic Information and Physiological Traits in A Soft Wheat Panel Evaluated in Multi-Environments.
Guo J; Pradhan S; Shahi D; Khan J; Mcbreen J; Bai G; Murphy JP; Babar MA
Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):7023. PubMed ID: 32341406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Genomic Selection Models to Predict Flowering Time and Spike Grain Number in Two Hexaploid Wheat Doubled Haploid Populations.
Thavamanikumar S; Dolferus R; Thumma BR
G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Jul; 5(10):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26206349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Hybrid breeding of rice via genomic selection.
Cui Y; Li R; Li G; Zhang F; Zhu T; Zhang Q; Ali J; Li Z; Xu S
Plant Biotechnol J; 2020 Jan; 18(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 31124256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models.
Cuevas J; Crossa J; Montesinos-López OA; Burgueño J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; de Los Campos G
G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jan; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 27793970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Genomic prediction and association mapping of maize grain yield in multi-environment trials based on reaction norm models.
Tolley SA; Brito LF; Wang DR; Tuinstra MR
Front Genet; 2023; 14():1221751. PubMed ID: 37719703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accounting for Genotype-by-Environment Interactions and Residual Genetic Variation in Genomic Selection for Water-Soluble Carbohydrate Concentration in Wheat.
Ovenden B; Milgate A; Wade LJ; Rebetzke GJ; Holland JB
G3 (Bethesda); 2018 May; 8(6):1909-1919. PubMed ID: 29661842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Increased Predictive Accuracy of Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction Model for Yield and Related Traits in Spring Wheat (
Tomar V; Singh D; Dhillon GS; Chung YS; Poland J; Singh RP; Joshi AK; Gautam Y; Tiwari BS; Kumar U
Front Plant Sci; 2021; 12():720123. PubMed ID: 34691100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Genomic Prediction Enhanced Sparse Testing for Multi-environment Trials.
Jarquin D; Howard R; Crossa J; Beyene Y; Gowda M; Martini JWR; Covarrubias Pazaran G; Burgueño J; Pacheco A; Grondona M; Wimmer V; Prasanna BM
G3 (Bethesda); 2020 Aug; 10(8):2725-2739. PubMed ID: 32527748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Environment-specific genomic prediction ability in maize using environmental covariates depends on environmental similarity to training data.
Rogers AR; Holland JB
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 35100364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Relationships between four measures of genetic distance and breeding behavior in spring wheat.
Benin G; Matei G; Costa de Oliveira A; Silva GO; Hagemann TR; Lemes da Silva C; Pagliosa ES; Beche E
Genet Mol Res; 2012 Aug; 11(3):2390-400. PubMed ID: 22782625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Combining ability in the F1 and F2 generations of diallel cross in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell).
Joshi SK; Sharma SN; Singhania DL; Sain RS
Hereditas; 2004; 141(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 15660971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A quantitative genetic framework highlights the role of epistatic effects for grain-yield heterosis in bread wheat.
Jiang Y; Schmidt RH; Zhao Y; Reif JC
Nat Genet; 2017 Dec; 49(12):1741-1746. PubMed ID: 29038596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genomic Prediction of Yield Traits in Single-Cross Hybrid Rice (
Labroo MR; Ali J; Aslam MU; de Asis EJ; Dela Paz MA; Sevilla MA; Lipka AE; Studer AJ; Rutkoski JE
Front Genet; 2021; 12():692870. PubMed ID: 34276796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predicting rice hybrid performance using univariate and multivariate GBLUP models based on North Carolina mating design II.
Wang X; Li L; Yang Z; Zheng X; Yu S; Xu C; Hu Z
Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Mar; 118(3):302-310. PubMed ID: 27649618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
