These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30951082)

  • 61. Genomic selection in wheat: optimum allocation of test resources and comparison of breeding strategies for line and hybrid breeding.
    Longin CF; Mi X; Würschum T
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Jul; 128(7):1297-306. PubMed ID: 25877519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Genomic prediction in biparental tropical maize populations in water-stressed and well-watered environments using low-density and GBS SNPs.
    Zhang X; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Semagn K; Beyene Y; Babu R; López-Cruz MA; San Vicente F; Olsen M; Buckler E; Jannink JL; Prasanna BM; Crossa J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Mar; 114(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 25407079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Optimizing Training Population Size and Genotyping Strategy for Genomic Prediction Using Association Study Results and Pedigree Information. A Case of Study in Advanced Wheat Breeding Lines.
    Cericola F; Jahoor A; Orabi J; Andersen JR; Janss LL; Jensen J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169606. PubMed ID: 28081208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Accuracy of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in two control-pollinated progeny trials using exome capture as the genotyping platform in Norway spruce.
    Chen ZQ; Baison J; Pan J; Karlsson B; Andersson B; Westin J; García-Gil MR; Wu HX
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Dec; 19(1):946. PubMed ID: 30563448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The importance of dominance and genotype-by-environment interactions on grain yield variation in a large-scale public cooperative maize experiment.
    Rogers AR; Dunne JC; Romay C; Bohn M; Buckler ES; Ciampitti IA; Edwards J; Ertl D; Flint-Garcia S; Gore MA; Graham C; Hirsch CN; Hood E; Hooker DC; Knoll J; Lee EC; Lorenz A; Lynch JP; McKay J; Moose SP; Murray SC; Nelson R; Rocheford T; Schnable JC; Schnable PS; Sekhon R; Singh M; Smith M; Springer N; Thelen K; Thomison P; Thompson A; Tuinstra M; Wallace J; Wisser RJ; Xu W; Gilmour AR; Kaeppler SM; De Leon N; Holland JB
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 33585867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. FW: An R Package for Finlay-Wilkinson Regression that Incorporates Genomic/Pedigree Information and Covariance Structures Between Environments.
    Lian L; de Los Campos G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Dec; 6(3):589-97. PubMed ID: 26715095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A Variational Bayes Genomic-Enabled Prediction Model with Genotype × Environment Interaction.
    Montesinos-López OA; Montesinos-López A; Crossa J; Montesinos-López JC; Luna-Vázquez FJ; Salinas-Ruiz J; Herrera-Morales JR; Buenrostro-Mariscal R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jun; 7(6):1833-1853. PubMed ID: 28391241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Sire evaluation for total number born in pigs using a genomic reaction norms approach.
    Silva FF; Mulder HA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Guimarães SE; Lopes PS; Mathur PK; Viana JM; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Sep; 92(9):3825-34. PubMed ID: 24492557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Genome-Wide Association and Prediction of Grain and Semolina Quality Traits in Durum Wheat Breeding Populations.
    Fiedler JD; Salsman E; Liu Y; Michalak de Jiménez M; Hegstad JB; Chen B; Manthey FA; Chao S; Xu S; Elias EM; Li X
    Plant Genome; 2017 Nov; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 29293807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Across-years prediction of hybrid performance in maize using genomics.
    Schrag TA; Schipprack W; Melchinger AE
    Theor Appl Genet; 2019 Apr; 132(4):933-946. PubMed ID: 30498894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
    Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Improving the baking quality of bread wheat by genomic selection in early generations.
    Michel S; Kummer C; Gallee M; Hellinger J; Ametz C; Akgöl B; Epure D; Güngör H; Löschenberger F; Buerstmayr H
    Theor Appl Genet; 2018 Feb; 131(2):477-493. PubMed ID: 29063161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Genome-Enabled Estimates of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variances and Prediction of Apple Phenotypes Across Environments.
    Kumar S; Molloy C; Muñoz P; Daetwyler H; Chagné D; Volz R
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2711-8. PubMed ID: 26497141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Yield performance and stability of CMS-based triticale hybrids.
    Mühleisen J; Piepho HP; Maurer HP; Reif JC
    Theor Appl Genet; 2015 Feb; 128(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 25511902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Optimizing predictions in IRRI's rice drought breeding program by leveraging 17 years of historical data and pedigree information.
    Khanna A; Anumalla M; Catolos M; Bhosale S; Jarquin D; Hussain W
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():983818. PubMed ID: 36204059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Genotype by environment (climate) interaction improves genomic prediction for production traits in US Holstein cattle.
    Tiezzi F; de Los Campos G; Parker Gaddis KL; Maltecca C
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Mar; 100(3):2042-2056. PubMed ID: 28109596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Enhancing Hybrid Prediction in Pearl Millet Using Genomic and/or Multi-Environment Phenotypic Information of Inbreds.
    Jarquin D; Howard R; Liang Z; Gupta SK; Schnable JC; Crossa J
    Front Genet; 2019; 10():1294. PubMed ID: 32038702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Genomic Prediction Accounting for Genotype by Environment Interaction Offers an Effective Framework for Breeding Simultaneously for Adaptation to an Abiotic Stress and Performance Under Normal Cropping Conditions in Rice.
    Ben Hassen M; Bartholomé J; Valè G; Cao TV; Ahmadi N
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jul; 8(7):2319-2332. PubMed ID: 29743189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Epistasis and covariance: how gene interaction translates into genomic relationship.
    Martini JW; Wimmer V; Erbe M; Simianer H
    Theor Appl Genet; 2016 May; 129(5):963-76. PubMed ID: 26883048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.