These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30951120)
1. Current Insights into the Effectiveness of Riparian Management, Attainment of Multiple Benefits, and Potential Technical Enhancements. Stutter M; Kronvang B; Ó hUallacháin D; Rozemeijer J J Environ Qual; 2019 Mar; 48(2):236-247. PubMed ID: 30951120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Riparian buffer strips as a multifunctional management tool in agricultural landscapes: introduction. Stutter MI; Chardon WJ; Kronvang B J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 22370391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating riparian solutions to multiple stressor problems in river ecosystems - A conceptual study. Feld CK; Fernandes MR; Ferreira MT; Hering D; Ormerod SJ; Venohr M; Gutiérrez-Cánovas C Water Res; 2018 Aug; 139():381-394. PubMed ID: 29673937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Are forested buffers an effective conservation strategy for riparian fauna? An assessment using meta-analysis. Marczak LB; Sakamaki T; Turvey SL; Deguise I; Wood SL; Richardson JS Ecol Appl; 2010 Jan; 20(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 20349835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. Mayer PM; Reynolds SK; McCutchen MD; Canfield TJ J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(4):1172-80. PubMed ID: 17596626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel index for assessment of riparian strip efficiency in agricultural landscapes using high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Novoa J; Chokmani K; Lhissou R Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():1439-1451. PubMed ID: 30743856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Saturated Riparian Buffers: Are We Trading a Water Quality Problem for an Air Quality Problem? Davis MP; Groh TA; Jaynes DB; Parkin TB; Isenhart TM J Environ Qual; 2019 Mar; 48(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 30951114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stocks in hybrid poplar buffers, herbaceous buffers and natural woodlots in the riparian zone on agricultural land. Fortier J; Truax B; Gagnon D; Lambert F J Environ Manage; 2015 May; 154():333-45. PubMed ID: 25753395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A VSA-based strategy for placing conservation buffers in agricultural watersheds. Qiu Z Environ Manage; 2003 Sep; 32(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 14753616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural and functional characteristics of buffer strip vegetation in an agricultural landscape - high potential for nutrient removal but low potential for plant biodiversity. Hille S; Andersen DK; Kronvang B; Baattrup-Pedersen A Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jul; 628-629():805-814. PubMed ID: 29455130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of core terrestrial habitat for stream-breeding salamanders and delineation of riparian buffers for protection of biodiversity. Crawford JA; Semlitsch RD Conserv Biol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 17298521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interactions of site-specific factors on riparian buffer effectiveness across multiple pollutants: A review. Stutter M; Costa FB; Ó hUallacháin D Sci Total Environ; 2021 Dec; 798():149238. PubMed ID: 34325145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Assessment of the Multifunctionality of Integrated Buffer Zones in Northwestern Europe. Zak D; Stutter M; Jensen HS; Egemose S; Carstensen MV; Audet J; Strand JA; Feuerbach P; Hoffmann CC; Christen B; Hille S; Knudsen M; Stockan J; Watson H; Heckrath G; Kronvang B J Environ Qual; 2019 Mar; 48(2):362-375. PubMed ID: 30951130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A micro case study of the legal and administrative arrangements for river health in the Kangaroo River (NSW). Mooney C; Farrier D Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):161-8. PubMed ID: 12171348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Field-based evaluation tool for riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments. Ducros CM; Joyce CB Environ Manage; 2003 Aug; 32(2):252-67. PubMed ID: 14753650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Climate change mitigation for agriculture: water quality benefits and costs. Wilcock R; Elliott S; Hudson N; Parkyn S; Quinn J Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19092184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land. Dosskey MG Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 28(5):577-98. PubMed ID: 11568840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of vegetated buffers and a meta-analysis of their mitigation efficacy in reducing nonpoint source pollution. Zhang X; Liu X; Zhang M; Dahlgren RA; Eitzel M J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 20048295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Major factors influencing the efficacy of vegetated buffers on sediment trapping: a review and analysis. Liu X; Zhang X; Zhang M J Environ Qual; 2008; 37(5):1667-74. PubMed ID: 18689727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Bayesian Belief Network learning tool integrates multi-scale effects of riparian buffers on stream invertebrates. Forio MAE; Burdon FJ; De Troyer N; Lock K; Witing F; Baert L; De Saeyer N; Rîșnoveanu G; Popescu C; Kupilas B; Friberg N; Boets P; Johnson RK; Volk M; McKie BG; Goethals PLM Sci Total Environ; 2022 Mar; 810():152146. PubMed ID: 34864036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]