These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30951379)

  • 1. Effects of an 8-week physical exercise program on spinal manipulation biomechanical parameters in a group of 1st-year chiropractic students.
    Lardon A; Pasquier M; Audo Y; Barbier-Cazorla F; Descarreaux M
    J Chiropr Educ; 2019 Oct; 33(2):118-124. PubMed ID: 30951379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Erratum.
    Mult Scler; 2016 Oct; 22(12):NP9-NP11. PubMed ID: 26041800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning spinal manipulation: the importance of augmented feedback relating to various kinetic parameters.
    Descarreaux M; Dugas C; Lalanne K; Vincelette M; Normand MC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16517384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Augmented Feedback and Expertise on Spinal Manipulation Skills: An Experimental Study.
    Pasquier M; Cheron C; Dugas C; Lardon A; Descarreaux M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2017; 40(6):404-410. PubMed ID: 28822474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement and Analysis of Biomechanical Outcomes of Chiropractic Adjustment Performance in Chiropractic Education and Practice.
    Colloca CJ; Cunliffe C; Hegazy MA; Pinnock M; Hinrichs RN
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2020; 43(3):212-224. PubMed ID: 32709512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Systematic Augmented Feedback and Dependency in Spinal Manipulation Learning: a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Lardon A; Cheron C; Pagé I; Dugas C; Descarreaux M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2016; 39(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 27016338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning Spinal Manipulation: Objective and Subjective Assessment of Performance.
    Pasquier M; Chéron C; Barbier G; Dugas C; Lardon A; Descarreaux M
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2020; 43(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 32951767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning spinal manipulation skills: assessment of biomechanical parameters in a 5-year longitudinal study.
    Descarreaux M; Dugas C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2010; 33(3):226-30. PubMed ID: 20350677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation training of prescribed forces and thrust duration: A pilot study.
    Shannon ZK; Vining RD; Gudavalli MR; Boesch RJ
    J Chiropr Educ; 2020 Oct; 34(2):107-115. PubMed ID: 30951380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in Manipulative Peak Force Modulation and Time to Peak Thrust among First-Year Chiropractic Students Following a 12-Week Detraining Period.
    Starmer DJ; Guist BP; Tuff TR; Warren SC; Williams MG
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2016 May; 39(4):311-7. PubMed ID: 27059248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning spinal manipulation: the effect of expertise on transfer capability.
    Descarreaux M; Dugas C; Treboz J; Cheron C; Nougarou F
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2015 May; 38(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 25925020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Testing a strength and conditioning program to prevent common manipulative technique training injuries in chiropractic students: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Hodgetts CJ; Walker BF
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2018; 26():23. PubMed ID: 29988310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of practice variability on spinal manipulation learning.
    Marchand AA; Mendoza L; Dugas C; Descarreaux M; Pagé I
    J Chiropr Educ; 2017 Oct; 31(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 28121458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developing skilled performance of lumbar spine manipulation.
    Triano JJ; Rogers CM; Combs S; Potts D; Sorrels K
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2002; 25(6):353-61. PubMed ID: 12183693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantitative feedback versus standard training for cervical and thoracic manipulation.
    Triano JJ; Rogers CM; Combs S; Potts D; Sorrels K
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003; 26(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 12704305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning spinal manipulation: a comparison of two teaching models.
    Harvey MP; Wynd S; Richardson L; Dugas C; Descarreaux M
    J Chiropr Educ; 2011; 25(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 22069337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tactile Perception of Pressure and Volitional Thrust Intensity Modulate Spinal Manipulation Dose Characteristics.
    Passmore SR; Gelley GM; Malone Q; MacNeil BJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2019 Jun; 42(5):335-342. PubMed ID: 31272711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning spinal manipulation: Gender and expertise differences in biomechanical parameters, accuracy, and variability.
    Pasquier M; Barbier-Cazorla F; Audo Y; Descarreaux M; Lardon A
    J Chiropr Educ; 2019 Mar; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 30408423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A pilot study of the effect of force feedback training on students learning flexion-distraction chiropractic technique.
    Rowell RM; Gudavalli MR; Silverman S
    J Chiropr Educ; 2019 Oct; 33(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 30590012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A pilot study to determine the consistency of peak forces during cervical spine manipulation utilizing mannequins.
    Duquette SA; Starmer DJ; Plener JB; BSc DAG
    J Chiropr Educ; 2021 Mar; 35(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 32930333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.