These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Recognizing real materials from their glossy appearance. Ged G; Obein G; Silvestri Z; Le Rohellec J; Viénot F J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 21187348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Visual perception of materials and their properties. Fleming RW Vision Res; 2014 Jan; 94():62-75. PubMed ID: 24291494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lightness perception for matte and glossy complex shapes. Toscani M; Valsecchi M; Gegenfurtner KR Vision Res; 2017 Feb; 131():82-95. PubMed ID: 28025053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of head motion and stereo viewing on perceived glossiness. Sakano Y; Ando H J Vis; 2010 Nov; 10(9):15. PubMed ID: 21106677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Luminance and contrast cues are integrated in global shape detection with contours. Bell J; Badcock DR Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(21):2336-44. PubMed ID: 18703078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Looking against the light: how perception of translucency depends on lighting direction. Xiao B; Walter B; Gkioulekas I; Zickler T; Adelson E; Bala K J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):17. PubMed ID: 24627457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading. Kim J; Marlow P; Anderson BL J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 21841140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Unsupervised learning predicts human perception and misperception of gloss. Storrs KR; Anderson BL; Fleming RW Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Oct; 5(10):1402-1417. PubMed ID: 33958744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Limits of lightness identification for real objects under natural viewing conditions. Robilotto R; Zaidi Q J Vis; 2004 Sep; 4(9):779-97. PubMed ID: 15493970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Perception of illumination direction in images of 3-D convex objects: influence of surface materials and light fields. Khang BG; Koenderink JJ; Kappers AM Perception; 2006; 35(5):625-45. PubMed ID: 16836054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Temporal properties of material categorization and material rating: visual vs non-visual material features. Nagai T; Matsushima T; Koida K; Tani Y; Kitazaki M; Nakauchi S Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt B):259-70. PubMed ID: 25536464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Frequency-based heuristics for material perception. Giesel M; Zaidi Q J Vis; 2013 Dec; 13(14):. PubMed ID: 24317425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Human vision is attuned to the diffuseness of natural light. Morgenstern Y; Geisler WS; Murray RF J Vis; 2014 Aug; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 25139864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of Material Appearance Under Different Spotlight Distributions Compared to Natural Illumination. Yamazoe T; Funaki T; Kiyasu Y; Mizokami Y J Imaging; 2019 Feb; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 34460479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The deleterious effect of contrast reversal on recognition is unique to faces, not objects. Nederhouser M; Yue X; Mangini MC; Biederman I Vision Res; 2007 Jul; 47(16):2134-42. PubMed ID: 17562344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Learning different light prior distributions for different contexts. Kerrigan IS; Adams WJ Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 23376295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A fair test of the effect of a shadow-incompatible luminance gradient on the simultaneous lightness contrast. Logvinenko AD Perception; 2003; 32(6):717-20; discussion 721-30. PubMed ID: 12892432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]