130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30952331)
1. A comparison of fish tissue mercury concentrations from homogenized fillet and nonlethal biopsy plugs.
Knight A; Bhavsar SP; Branfireun BA; Drouin P; Prashad R; Petro S; Oke M
J Environ Sci (China); 2019 Jun; 80():137-145. PubMed ID: 30952331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of potentially nonlethal sampling methods for monitoring mercury concentrations in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu).
Schmitt CJ; Brumbaugh WG
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2007 Jul; 53(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 17486284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Evaluation of Fish Tissue Monitoring Alternatives for Mercury and Selenium: Fish Muscle Biopsy Samples Versus Homogenized Whole Fillets.
Stahl LL; Snyder BD; McCarty HB; Cohen TR; Miller KM; Fernandez MB; Healey JC
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 81(2):236-254. PubMed ID: 34331106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implementation of a non-lethal biopsy punch monitoring program for mercury in smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieu Lacepède, from the Eleven Point River, Missouri.
Ackerson JR; McKee MJ; Schmitt CJ; Brumbaugh WG
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2014 Feb; 92(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 24196376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Two Total Mercury Screening and Assessment Methods in Fishes: Biopsy Punch and Dried Muscle Samples.
Cyr A; Murillo-Cisneros DA; López JA; Furin C; O'Hara T
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 85(2):119-128. PubMed ID: 37573269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Concentrations of cadmium, cobalt, lead, nickel, and zinc in blood and fillets of northern hog sucker (Hypentelium nigricans) from streams contaminated by lead-zinc mining: implications for monitoring.
Schmitt CJ; Brumbaugh WG; May TW
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009 Apr; 56(3):509-24. PubMed ID: 19205790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analysis of fin clips as a nonlethal method for monitoring mercury in fish.
Rolfhus KR; Sandheinrich MB; Wiener JG; Bailey SW; Thoreson KA; Hammerschmidt CR
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Feb; 42(3):871-7. PubMed ID: 18323115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A biopsy procedure for determining filet and predicting whole-fish mercury concentration.
Peterson SA; Van Sickle J; Hughes RM; Schacher JA; Echols SF
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 48(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 15657811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A national statistical survey assessment of mercury concentrations in fillets of fish collected in the U.S. EPA national rivers and streams assessment of the continental USA.
Wathen JB; Lazorchak JM; Olsen AR; Batt A
Chemosphere; 2015 Mar; 122():52-61. PubMed ID: 25434269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is it appropriate to composite fish samples for mercury trend monitoring and consumption advisories?
Gandhi N; Bhavsar SP; Gewurtz SB; Drouillard KG; Arhonditsis GB; Petro S
Environ Int; 2016 Mar; 88():80-85. PubMed ID: 26724584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigations of mercury concentrations in walleye and other fish in the Athabasca River ecosystem with increasing oil sands developments.
Evans MS; Talbot A
J Environ Monit; 2012 Jul; 14(7):1989-2003. PubMed ID: 22652822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biota monitoring under the Water Framework Directive: On tissue choice and fish species selection.
Fliedner A; Rüdel H; Lohmann N; Buchmeier G; Koschorreck J
Environ Pollut; 2018 Apr; 235():129-140. PubMed ID: 29276959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A history of total mercury in edible muscle of fish from lakes in northern Canada.
Lockhart WL; Stern GA; Low G; Hendzel M; Boila G; Roach P; Evans MS; Billeck BN; DeLaronde J; Friesen S; Kidd K; Atkins S; Muir DC; Stoddart M; Stephens G; Stephenson S; Harbicht S; Snowshoe N; Grey B; Thompson S; DeGraff N
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Dec; 351-352():427-63. PubMed ID: 16169059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Total mercury concentrations in lakes and fish of western Maryland, USA.
Castro MS; McLaughlin EN; Davis SL; Morgan RP
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2002 May; 42(4):454-62. PubMed ID: 11994787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decreasing aqueous mercury concentrations to meet the water quality criterion in fish: examining the water-fish relationship in two point-source contaminated streams.
Mathews TJ; Southworth G; Peterson MJ; Roy WK; Ketelle RH; Valentine C; Gregory S
Sci Total Environ; 2013 Jan; 443():836-43. PubMed ID: 23246664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal and spatial trends of mercury in fish collected in the English-Wabigoon river system in Ontario, Canada.
Kinghorn A; Solomon P; Chan HM
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Jan; 372(2-3):615-23. PubMed ID: 17161450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of the spatiotemporal trends of mercury in Lake Erie fish communities: a Bayesian approach.
Azim ME; Kumarappah A; Bhavsar SP; Backus SM; Arhonditsis G
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(6):2217-26. PubMed ID: 21329342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimizing fish sampling for fish-mercury bioaccumulation factors.
Scudder Eikenberry BC; Riva-Murray K; Knightes CD; Journey CA; Chasar LC; Brigham ME; Bradley PM
Chemosphere; 2015 Sep; 135():467-73. PubMed ID: 25592462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temporal and geographic trends in mercury concentrations in muscle tissue in five species of Hudson River, USA, fish.
Levinton JS; Pochron ST
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2008 Aug; 27(8):1691-7. PubMed ID: 18266478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elevated mercury concentrations in fish in lakes in the Mackenzie River Basin: the role of physical, chemical, and biological factors.
Evans MS; Lockhart WL; Doetzel L; Low G; Muir D; Kidd K; Stephens G; Delaronde J
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Dec; 351-352():479-500. PubMed ID: 16183101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
