These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30952353)

  • 1. Application of powdered activated carbon coating to fabrics in a hybrid filter to enhance mercury removal.
    Sung JH; Back SK; Lee ES; Jang HN; Seo YC; Kang YS; Lee MH
    J Environ Sci (China); 2019 Jun; 80():58-65. PubMed ID: 30952353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The simultaneous capture of mercury and fine particles by hybrid filter with powder activated carbon injection.
    Jang HN; Back SK; Sung JH; Kang YS; Jurng J; Seo YC
    Environ Pollut; 2018 Jun; 237():531-540. PubMed ID: 29524875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study on emission of hazardous trace elements in a 350 MW coal-fired power plant. Part 1. Mercury.
    Zhao S; Duan Y; Chen L; Li Y; Yao T; Liu S; Liu M; Lu J
    Environ Pollut; 2017 Oct; 229():863-870. PubMed ID: 28779897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adsorbents for capturing mercury in coal-fired boiler flue gas.
    Yang H; Xu Z; Fan M; Bland AE; Judkins RR
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jul; 146(1-2):1-11. PubMed ID: 17544578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mercury speciation and mass distribution of coal-fired power plants in Taiwan using different air pollution control processes.
    Chou CP; Chiu CH; Chang TC; Hsi HC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2021 May; 71(5):553-563. PubMed ID: 33284737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Active methods of mercury removal from flue gases.
    Marczak M; Budzyń S; Szczurowski J; Kogut K; Burmistrz P
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(9):8383-8392. PubMed ID: 29572741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of pressure drop and flow redistribution on modeling mercury control using sorbent injection in baghouse filters.
    Flora JR; Hargis RA; O'Dowd WJ; Karash A; Pennline HW; Vidic RD
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2006 Mar; 56(3):343-9. PubMed ID: 16573197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review on removal of mercury from flue gas utilizing existing air pollutant control devices (APCDs).
    Li Y; Yu J; Liu Y; Huang R; Wang Z; Zhao Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2022 Apr; 427():128132. PubMed ID: 35038661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distribution of mercury in the combustion products from coal-fired power plants in Guizhou, southwest China.
    Liu S; Chen J; Cao Y; Yang H; Chen C; Jia W
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Feb; 69(2):234-245. PubMed ID: 30396327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Possibilities of mercury removal in the dry flue gas cleaning lines of solid waste incineration units.
    Svoboda K; Hartman M; Šyc M; Pohořelý M; Kameníková P; Jeremiáš M; Durda T
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 166():499-511. PubMed ID: 26588812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of coal-fired power plants.
    Liu SH; Yan NQ; Liu ZR; Qu Z; Wang HP; Chang SG; Miller C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb; 41(4):1405-12. PubMed ID: 17593749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The performance of iodine on the removal of elemental mercury from the simulated coal-fired flue gas.
    Chi Y; Yan N; Qu Z; Qiao S; Jia J
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):776-81. PubMed ID: 19153004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The fate and behavior of mercury in coal-fired power plants.
    Meij R; Vredenbregt LH; te Winkel H
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 Aug; 52(8):912-7. PubMed ID: 12184689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The secondary release of mercury in coal fly ash-based flue-gas mercury removal technology.
    He J; Duan C; Lei M; Zhu X
    Environ Technol; 2016; 37(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 26121324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High-efficient adsorption and removal of elemental mercury from smelting flue gas by cobalt sulfide.
    Liu H; You Z; Yang S; Liu C; Xie X; Xiang K; Wang X; Yan X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(7):6735-6744. PubMed ID: 30632039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Control strategies of atmospheric mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China.
    Tian H; Wang Y; Cheng K; Qu Y; Hao J; Xue Z; Chai F
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 May; 62(5):576-86. PubMed ID: 22696807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulation of mercury capture by activated carbon injection in incinerator flue gas. 2. Fabric filter removal.
    Scala F
    Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Nov; 35(21):4373-8. PubMed ID: 11718360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The thief process for mercury removal from flue gas.
    Granite EJ; Freeman MC; Hargis RA; O'Dowd WJ; Pennline HW
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 84(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 16959396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Concurrent removal of elemental mercury and SO
    Balasundaram K; Sharma M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jun; 25(16):15518-15528. PubMed ID: 29569202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bromine chloride as an oxidant to improve elemental mercury removal from coal-fired flue gas.
    Qu Z; Yan N; Liu P; Chi Y; Jia J
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(22):8610-5. PubMed ID: 20028060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.