These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30952398)

  • 1. Tools and Methods for Real-World Evidence Generation: Pragmatic Trials, Electronic Consent, and Data Linkages.
    Curtis JR; Foster PJ; Saag KG
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2019 May; 45(2):275-289. PubMed ID: 30952398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The APPROACH trial: Assessing pain, patient-reported outcomes, and complementary and integrative health.
    Zeliadt SB; Coggeshall S; Thomas E; Gelman H; Taylor SL
    Clin Trials; 2020 Aug; 17(4):351-359. PubMed ID: 32522024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing the design of pragmatic trials: key issues remain.
    Caro JJ; Ishak KJ
    J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Jul; 1(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 24237466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Streamlining the institutional review board process in pragmatic randomized clinical trials: challenges and lessons learned from the Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) trial.
    Marquis-Gravel G; Robertson H; Jones WS; Riley D; Ford DE; Crenshaw D; Joosten YA; Rudov L; Hernandez AF; Hess R
    Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):90. PubMed ID: 33494785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cluster over individual randomization: are study design choices appropriately justified? Review of a random sample of trials.
    Taljaard M; Goldstein CE; Giraudeau B; Nicholls SG; Carroll K; Hey SP; Brehaut JC; Jairath V; London AJ; Eldridge SM; Grimshaw JM; Fergusson DA; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2020 Jun; 17(3):253-263. PubMed ID: 32367741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 4. Informed consent.
    Kalkman S; van Thiel GJMW; Zuidgeest MGP; Goetz I; Pfeiffer BM; Grobbee DE; van Delden JJM;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():181-187. PubMed ID: 28502809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Young people's views about consenting to data linkage: findings from the PEARL qualitative study.
    Audrey S; Brown L; Campbell R; Boyd A; Macleod J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():34. PubMed ID: 27001504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Willingness to participate in pragmatic dialysis trials: the importance of physician decisional autonomy and consent approach.
    Courtright KR; Halpern SD; Joffe S; Ellenberg SS; Karlawish J; Madden V; Gabler NB; Szymanski S; Yadav KN; Dember LM
    Trials; 2017 Oct; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29020994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patients' beliefs regarding informed consent for low-risk pragmatic trials.
    Dal-Ré R; Carcas AJ; Carné X; Wendler D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):145. PubMed ID: 28923007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stakeholders' views on the ethical challenges of pragmatic trials investigating pharmaceutical drugs.
    Kalkman S; van Thiel GJ; Grobbee DE; Meinecke AK; Zuidgeest MG; van Delden JJ;
    Trials; 2016 Aug; 17(1):419. PubMed ID: 27550379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical Acceptability of Postrandomization Consent in Pragmatic Clinical Trials.
    Miller DG; Kim SYH; Li X; Dickert NW; Flory J; Runge CP; Relton C
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Dec; 1(8):e186149. PubMed ID: 30646316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium: Linking a Clinical and Translational Science Institute With a Community-Based Distributive Medical Education Model.
    Shenkman E; Hurt M; Hogan W; Carrasquillo O; Smith S; Brickman A; Nelson D
    Acad Med; 2018 Mar; 93(3):451-455. PubMed ID: 29045273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pragmatic randomised clinical trials using electronic health records: general practitioner views on a model of a priori consent.
    Hills T; Semprini A; Beasley R
    Trials; 2018 May; 19(1):278. PubMed ID: 29769088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods to analyze real-world databases and registries.
    Kremers HM
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 19583553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Some principles of the development of a clinical database/national register of selected inflammatory rheumatic diseases in the Czech Republic.
    Dostal C; Pavelka K; Zvárová J; Hanzlícek P; Olejárová M
    Int J Med Inform; 2006; 75(3-4):216-23. PubMed ID: 16169767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.
    Kim SY; Flory J; Relton C
    Clin Trials; 2018 Feb; 15(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 29224380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding preferences regarding consent for pragmatic trials in acute care.
    Dickert NW; Wendler D; Devireddy CM; Goldkind SF; Ko YA; Speight CD; Kim SY
    Clin Trials; 2018 Dec; 15(6):567-578. PubMed ID: 30280582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 8. Data collection and management.
    Meinecke AK; Welsing P; Kafatos G; Burke D; Trelle S; Kubin M; Nachbaur G; Egger M; Zuidgeest M;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Nov; 91():13-22. PubMed ID: 28716504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The opportunities and challenges of pragmatic point-of-care randomised trials using routinely collected electronic records: evaluations of two exemplar trials.
    van Staa TP; Dyson L; McCann G; Padmanabhan S; Belatri R; Goldacre B; Cassell J; Pirmohamed M; Torgerson D; Ronaldson S; Adamson J; Taweel A; Delaney B; Mahmood S; Baracaia S; Round T; Fox R; Hunter T; Gulliford M; Smeeth L
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Jul; 18(43):1-146. PubMed ID: 25011568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.