These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

541 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30952574)

  • 21. Critical Reappraisal of the Time-in-Range: Alternative or Useful Addition to Glycated Hemoglobin?
    Heinemann L; Freckmann G; Müller-Wieland D; Kellerer M
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Sep; 14(5):922-927. PubMed ID: 31675907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effect of Reduced Self-Monitored Blood Glucose Testing After Adoption of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hemoglobin A1c and Time in Range.
    Puhr S; Calhoun P; Welsh JB; Walker TC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Aug; 20(8):557-560. PubMed ID: 30036082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy of self-monitoring of blood glucose versus retrospective continuous glucose monitoring in improving glycaemic control in diabetic kidney disease patients.
    Yeoh E; Lim BK; Fun S; Tong J; Yeoh LY; Sum CF; Subramaniam T; Lim SC
    Nephrology (Carlton); 2018 Mar; 23(3):264-268. PubMed ID: 27933715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Glycemic Metrics Measured Simultaneously by Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Women with Type 1 Diabetes.
    Nørgaard SK; Mathiesen ER; Nørgaard K; Ringholm L
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2021 Oct; 23(10):665-672. PubMed ID: 34086494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of the SPECTRUM training programme for real-time continuous glucose monitoring: A real-world multicentre prospective study in 120 adults with type 1 diabetes.
    Schlüter S; Freckmann G; Heinemann L; Wintergerst P; Lange K
    Diabet Med; 2021 Feb; 38(2):e14467. PubMed ID: 33230860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of factors associated with improved glycemic control after switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes.
    Yamada E; Nakajima Y; Horiguchi K; Okada S; Yamada M
    Endocr J; 2023 Dec; 70(12):1187-1193. PubMed ID: 37766568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of technology on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis of randomized trials on continuous glucose monitoring and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
    Dicembrini I; Mannucci E; Monami M; Pala L
    Diabetes Obes Metab; 2019 Dec; 21(12):2619-2625. PubMed ID: 31368658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Baseline Glycated Hemoglobin Values Predict the Magnitude of Glycemic Improvement in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes: Subgroup Analyses from the DIAMOND Study Program.
    Billings LK; Parkin CG; Price D
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Aug; 20(8):561-565. PubMed ID: 30044123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost-utility analysis of Dexcom G6 real-time continuous glucose monitoring versus FreeStyle Libre 1 intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes in Belgium.
    Visser MM; Van Muylder A; Charleer S; Isitt JJ; Roze S; De Block C; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Luyten J; Gillard P; Verhaeghe N
    Diabetologia; 2024 Apr; 67(4):650-662. PubMed ID: 38236409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: Real-World Data from the German/Austrian Prospective Diabetes Follow-Up Registry.
    Sandig D; Grimsmann J; Reinauer C; Melmer A; Zimny S; Müller-Korbsch M; Forestier N; Zeyfang A; Bramlage P; Danne T; Meissner T; Holl RW
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Aug; 22(8):602-612. PubMed ID: 32522039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical Recommendations for the Use of the Ambulatory Glucose Profile in Diabetes Care.
    Kröger J; Reichel A; Siegmund T; Ziegler R
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 May; 14(3):586-594. PubMed ID: 31718268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yeh HC; Brown TT; Maruthur N; Ranasinghe P; Berger Z; Suh YD; Wilson LM; Haberl EB; Brick J; Bass EB; Golden SH
    Ann Intern Med; 2012 Sep; 157(5):336-47. PubMed ID: 22777524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Flash Glucose Monitoring: A Review of the Literature with a Special Focus on Type 1 Diabetes.
    Mancini G; Berioli MG; Santi E; Rogari F; Toni G; Tascini G; Crispoldi R; Ceccarini G; Esposito S
    Nutrients; 2018 Jul; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 30060632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Type 1 Diabetes: Longitudinal Analysis Demonstrates Meaningful Improvements in HbA1c and Reductions in Health Care Utilization.
    Parkin CG; Graham C; Smolskis J
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 May; 11(3):522-528. PubMed ID: 28745091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of switching from intermittently scanned to real-time continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 1 diabetes: 24-month results from the randomised ALERTT1 trial.
    Visser MM; Charleer S; Fieuws S; De Block C; Hilbrands R; Van Huffel L; Maes T; Vanhaverbeke G; Dirinck E; Myngheer N; Vercammen C; Nobels F; Keymeulen B; Mathieu C; Gillard P
    Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol; 2023 Feb; 11(2):96-108. PubMed ID: 36702566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Calibration algorithms for continuous glucose monitoring systems based on interstitial fluid sensing.
    Sun T; Liu J; Chen CJ
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2024 Sep; 260():116450. PubMed ID: 38843770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of accuracy between flash glucose monitoring and continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis.
    Matoba K; Hayashi A; Shimizu N; Moriguchi I; Kobayashi N; Shichiri M
    J Diabetes Complications; 2020 Nov; 34(11):107680. PubMed ID: 32736927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Time In Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Using Treatment Strategies Based on Nonautomated Insulin Delivery Systems in the Real World.
    Cherubini V; Bonfanti R; Casertano A; De Nitto E; Iannilli A; Lombardo F; Maltoni G; Marigliano M; Bassi M; Minuto N; Mozzillo E; Rabbone I; Rapini N; Rigamonti A; Salzano G; Scaramuzza A; Schiaffini R; Tinti D; Toni S; Zagaroli L; Zucchini S; Maffeis C; Gesuita R
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Jul; 22(7):509-515. PubMed ID: 32073311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical value of Flash glucose monitoring in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
    Moreno-Fernandez J; Pazos-Couselo M; González-Rodriguez M; Rozas P; Delgado M; Aguirre M; Garcia-Lopez JM
    Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed); 2018 Dec; 65(10):556-563. PubMed ID: 29907546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A concept for human use of real-time and remote monitoring of diabetic subjects using intermittent scanned continuous glucose measurement.
    Goez-Mora JE; Arbeláez-Córdoba N; Balcazar-Morales N; Rivadeneira PS
    Biomed Eng Online; 2024 Feb; 23(1):26. PubMed ID: 38419031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.