These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30953009)

  • 21. Declines in funding of NIH R01 research grants.
    Mandel HG; Vesell ES
    Science; 2006 Sep; 313(5792):1387-8. PubMed ID: 16959989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Toward Independence: Resubmission Rate of Unfunded National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute R01 Research Grant Applications Among Early Stage Investigators.
    Boyington JE; Antman MD; Patel KC; Lauer MS
    Acad Med; 2016 Apr; 91(4):556-62. PubMed ID: 26650674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Growing pains for NIH grant review.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2006 Jun; 125(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16751088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Early career academic productivity among emergency physicians with R01 grant funding.
    Scott Van Epps J; Younger JG
    Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 18(7):759-62. PubMed ID: 21762237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Patterns of Recent National Institutes of Health (NIH) Funding in General Surgery: Analysis Using the NIH RePORTER System.
    Berg EJ; Ashurst J
    Cureus; 2019 Jun; 11(6):e4938. PubMed ID: 31431843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Author Disambiguation in PubMed: Evidence on the Precision and Recall of Author-ity among NIH-Funded Scientists.
    Lerchenmueller MJ; Sorenson O
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158731. PubMed ID: 27367860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcomes of National Institutes of Health peer review of clinical grant applications.
    Kotchen TA; Lindquist T; Miller Sostek A; Hoffmann R; Malik K; Stanfield B
    J Investig Med; 2006 Jan; 54(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 16409886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Physician-scientists in neurology: Research contributions of a cohort of neurologists.
    Bensken WP; Hansen AK; Norato G; Heiss JD; Nath A; Khan OI
    Neurology; 2018 Sep; 91(11):508-514. PubMed ID: 30097476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.
    Warner ET; Carapinha R; Weber GM; Hill EV; Reede JY
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2017 Oct; 26(10):1086-1093. PubMed ID: 28771391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outcomes of early NIH-funded investigators: Experience of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
    Haggerty PA; Fenton MJ
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0199648. PubMed ID: 30208016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessing health research grant applications: A retrospective comparative review of a one-stage versus a two-stage application assessment process.
    Morgan B; Yu LM; Solomon T; Ziebland S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0230118. PubMed ID: 32163468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Surveys of current status in biomedical science grant review: funding organisations' and grant reviewers' perspectives.
    Schroter S; Groves T; Højgaard L
    BMC Med; 2010 Oct; 8():62. PubMed ID: 20961441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Impact of Individual Mentored Career Development (K) Awards on the Research Trajectories of Early-Career Scientists.
    Nikaj S; Lund PK
    Acad Med; 2019 May; 94(5):708-714. PubMed ID: 30520806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes.
    Nakamura RK; Mann LS; Lindner MD; Braithwaite J; Chen MC; Vancea A; Byrnes N; Durrant V; Reed B
    Elife; 2021 Oct; 10():. PubMed ID: 34665132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Racial bias continues to haunt NIH grants.
    Check Hayden E
    Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7578):286-7. PubMed ID: 26581270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Publication rates from biomedical and behavioral and social science R01s funded by the National Institutes of Health.
    Riley WT; Bibb K; Hargrave S; Fearon P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242271. PubMed ID: 33186405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enhancing NIH grant peer review: a broader perspective.
    Bonetta L
    Cell; 2008 Oct; 135(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 18957192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Happy 40th, NIH Shared Instrumentation Program! The NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant Program Embraces a Promising Future.
    Li XN; Grieder F
    J Biomol Tech; 2023 Mar; 34(1):. PubMed ID: 37089871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sex bias and omission in neuroscience research is influenced by research model and journal, but not reported NIH funding.
    Mamlouk GM; Dorris DM; Barrett LR; Meitzen J
    Front Neuroendocrinol; 2020 Apr; 57():100835. PubMed ID: 32070715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Race- and gender-based bias persists in US science.
    Nature; 2018 Feb; 554(7693):561. PubMed ID: 29469104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.