184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30953222)
1. A prospective randomized comparison of airway seal using the novel vision-guided insertion of LMA-Supreme® and LMA-Protector®.
van Zundert AAJ; Wyssusek KH; Pelecanos A; Roets M; Kumar CM
J Clin Monit Comput; 2020 Apr; 34(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 30953222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit.
Acx E; Van Caelenberg E; De Baerdemaeker L; Coppens M
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2021; 37(2):221-225. PubMed ID: 34349370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Moser B; Keller C; Audigé L; Bruppacher HR
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2019 Mar; 63(3):322-328. PubMed ID: 30229857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized crossover study assessing oropharyngeal leak pressure and fiber optic positioning : Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ versus Laryngeal Tube LTS II™ size 2 in non-paralyzed anesthetized children.
Gasteiger L; Ofner S; Stögermüller B; Ziegler B; Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anaesthesist; 2016 Aug; 65(8):585-9. PubMed ID: 27380049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized comparison of the Ambu AuraGain versus the LMA supreme in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery.
Lopez AM; Agusti M; Gambus P; Pons M; Anglada T; Valero R
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1255-1262. PubMed ID: 27889843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure.
Somri M; Vaida S; Garcia Fornari G; Mendoza GR; Charco-Mora P; Hawash N; Matter I; Swaid F; Gaitini L
BMC Anesthesiol; 2016 Oct; 16(1):87. PubMed ID: 27716165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Head Rotation Reduces Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure of the i-gel and LMA® Supreme™ in Paralyzed, Anesthetized Patients: A Randomized Trial.
Chaki T; Tachibana S; Kumita S; Sato H; Hamada K; Tokinaga Y; Yamakage M
Anesth Analg; 2021 Mar; 132(3):818-826. PubMed ID: 32889846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Maitra S; Khanna P; Baidya DK
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 May; 31(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 24145803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
Timmermann A; Cremer S; Eich C; Kazmaier S; Bräuer A; Graf BM; Russo SG
Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Performance Comparison of LMA Protector™ Cuff Pilot™ and LMA Supreme™ When Used in Anesthetized, Non-paralyzed Patients.
Chan WK; Liu CY
Cureus; 2022 Mar; 14(3):e23176. PubMed ID: 35308185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial.
Zhang L; Seet E; Mehta V; Subramanyam R; Ankichetty SP; Wong DT; Chung F
Can J Anaesth; 2011 Jul; 58(7):624-629. PubMed ID: 21533663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ambu® AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ Second Seal™: a randomised controlled trial comparing oropharyngeal leak pressures and gastric drain functionality in spontaneously breathing patients.
Shariffuddin II; Teoh WH; Tang E; Hashim N; Loh PS
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2017 Mar; 45(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 28267947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the LMA Supreme™ with the LMA Proseal™ for airway management in patients anaesthetized in prone position.
López AM; Valero R; Hurtado P; Gambús P; Pons M; Anglada T
Br J Anaesth; 2011 Aug; 107(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 21576096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised, non-crossover study of the GuardianCPV Laryngeal Mask versus the LMA Supreme in paralysed, anaesthetised female patients.
Tiefenthaler W; Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Fricke E; Keller C; Kaufmann M
Anaesthesia; 2013 Jun; 68(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 23550791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure between the Ambu® AuraGain™ and the LMA® Supreme™ supraglottic airways: a randomized-controlled trial.
Wong DT; Ooi A; Singh KP; Dallaire A; Meliana V; Lau J; Chung F; Singh M; Wong J
Can J Anaesth; 2018 Jul; 65(7):797-805. PubMed ID: 29582360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conditions for laryngeal mask airway placement in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure: a comparison between blind insertion and laryngoscope-guided insertion.
Kim GW; Kim JY; Kim SJ; Moon YR; Park EJ; Park SY
BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):4. PubMed ID: 30611202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation through i-gel
Mendonca C; Tourville CC; Jefferson H; Nowicka A; Patteril M; Athanassoglou V
Anaesthesia; 2019 Feb; 74(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 30467827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
