These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30953271)

  • 1. Risk factors of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-volume center: results in 732 cases.
    Porcaro AB; Sebben M; Corsi P; Tafuri A; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Cacciamani G; Mariotto A; Diminutto A; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Feb; 14(1):167-175. PubMed ID: 30953271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center.
    Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Shakir A; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Bernasconi R; Cerrato C; Tiso L; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Aug; 14(4):663-675. PubMed ID: 31893344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases.
    Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Corsi P; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Shakir A; Cacciamani G; Mariotto A; Brunelli M; Bernasconi R; Novella G; De Marco V; Artibani W
    Arab J Urol; 2019; 17(3):234-242. PubMed ID: 31489241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy: comparison between initial robotic experience of a high-volume open surgeon and his contemporary open series.
    Roscigno M; La Croce G; Naspro R; Nicolai M; Manica M; Scarcello M; Chinaglia D; Da Pozzo LF
    Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2019 Dec; 71(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 31144491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Amigoni N; Processali T; Pirozzi M; Rizzetto R; Shakir A; Corsi P; Tiso L; Cerrato C; Migliorini F; Novella G; Brunelli M; Bernasconi R; De Marco V; Siracusano S; Artibani W
    Ther Adv Urol; 2019; 11():1756287219878283. PubMed ID: 31579118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
    Tuliao PH; Koo KC; Komninos C; Chang CH; Choi YD; Chung BH; Hong SJ; Rha KH
    BJU Int; 2015 Dec; 116(6):897-904. PubMed ID: 25098818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Bütow Z; Schunk S; Janssen M; Gräber S; Saar M; Kamradt J; Siemer S; Stöckle M; Ohlmann CH
    Urol Int; 2015; 95(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 26575991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Superior Biochemical Recurrence and Long-term Quality-of-life Outcomes Are Achievable with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy After a Long Learning Curve-Updated Analysis of a Prospective Single-surgeon Cohort of 2206 Consecutive Cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Siriwardana AR; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):664-671. PubMed ID: 29273404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
    Sooriakumaran P; Ploumidis A; Nyberg T; Olsson M; Akre O; Haendler L; Egevad L; Nilsson A; Carlsson S; Jonsson M; Adding C; Hosseini A; Steineck G; Wiklund P
    BJU Int; 2015 Jan; 115(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 24119144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Keller EX; Bachofner J; Britschgi AJ; Saba K; Mortezavi A; Kaufmann B; Fankhauser CD; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T; Eberli D; Poyet C
    World J Urol; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1837-1844. PubMed ID: 30519744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tumour location determined by preoperative MRI is an independent predictor for positive surgical margin status after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Li Y; Fu Y; Li W; Xu L; Zhang Q; Gao J; Li D; Li X; Qiu X; Guo H
    BJU Int; 2020 Jul; 126(1):152-158. PubMed ID: 32219979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.
    Sivaraman A; Sanchez-Salas R; Prapotnich D; Yu K; Olivier F; Secin FP; Barret E; Galiano M; Rozet F; Cathelineau X
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 35(4):149.e1-149.e6. PubMed ID: 28117215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ABO blood group system and risk of positive surgical margins in patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results in 1114 consecutive patients.
    Porcaro AB; Amigoni N; Migliorini F; Rizzetto R; Tafuri A; Piccoli P; Tiso L; Cerrato C; Bianchi A; Gallina S; Orlando R; De Michele M; Gozzo A; Antoniolli SZ; De Marco V; Brunelli M; Cerruto MA; Artibani W; Siracusano S; Antonelli A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Jun; 16(3):507-516. PubMed ID: 34189707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating Incidence, Location, and Predictors of Positive Surgical Margin Among Chinese Men Undergoing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
    Qu W; Yu S; Tao J; Dong B; Fan Y; Du H; Deng H; Liu J; Zhang X
    Cancer Control; 2021; 28():10732748211055265. PubMed ID: 34794321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
    Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
    Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive Association between Preoperative Total Testosterone Levels and Risk of Positive Surgical Margins by Prostate Cancer: Results in 476 Consecutive Patients Treated Only by Radical Prostatectomy.
    Porcaro AB; Tafuri A; Sebben M; Corsi P; Pocessali T; Pirozzi M; Amigoni N; Rizzetto R; Mariotto A; Inverardi D; Brunelli M; Iacovelli R; Romano M; Siracusano S; Artibani W
    Urol Int; 2018; 101(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 29975957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
    McGinley KF; Sun X; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 26667212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Pelvimetrics measures as predictives factors of positives surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy].
    Moureaux C; Boucaud-Maitre D; Brureau L; Gourtaud G; Senechal C; Roux V; Blanchet P; Eyraud R
    Prog Urol; 2018 Dec; 28(16):906-914. PubMed ID: 30219645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.