184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30953538)
1. Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study.
Steegmans PAJ; Bipat S; Meursinge Reynders RA
Syst Rev; 2019 Apr; 8(1):89. PubMed ID: 30953538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spin in the reporting, interpretation, and extrapolation of adverse effects of orthodontic interventions: protocol for a cross-sectional study of systematic reviews.
Steegmans PAJ; Di Girolamo N; Meursinge Reynders RA
Res Integr Peer Rev; 2019; 4():27. PubMed ID: 31890311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Seeking adverse effects in systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: a cross-sectional study (part 1).
Steegmans PAJ; Di Girolamo N; Bipat S; Reynders RAM
Syst Rev; 2023 Jul; 12(1):112. PubMed ID: 37400925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Spin on adverse effects in abstracts of systematic reviews of orthodontic interventions: a cross-sectional study (part 2).
Steegmans PAJ; Di Girolamo N; Meursinge Reynders RA
Syst Rev; 2023 Jun; 12(1):99. PubMed ID: 37340504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting.
Vásquez-Cárdenas J; Zapata-Noreña Ó; Carvajal-Flórez Á; Barbosa-Liz DM; Giannakopoulos NN; Faggion CM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):442-452.e12. PubMed ID: 31582116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
Angle Orthod; 2013 Jan; 83(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 22720835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contacting of authors by systematic reviewers: protocol for a cross-sectional study and a survey.
Meursinge Reynders R; Ladu L; Di Girolamo N
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):249. PubMed ID: 29216930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
Fleming PS; Seehra J; Polychronopoulou A; Fedorowicz Z; Pandis N
Eur J Orthod; 2013 Apr; 35(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 22510325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of orthodontic mini-implants in clinical practice: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Meursinge Reynders R; Ronchi L; Ladu L; Di Girolamo N; de Lange J; Roberts N; Mickan S
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():22. PubMed ID: 26846440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist.
Li L; Xu C; Deng K; Zhou X; Liu Z; Busse JW; Ren Y; Zou K; Sun X
J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 105():125-135. PubMed ID: 30278212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Authorship characteristics of orthodontic randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses in non-orthodontic journals with impact factor.
Alqaydi AR; Kanavakis G; Naser-Ud-Din S; Athanasiou AE
Eur J Orthod; 2018 Sep; 40(5):480-487. PubMed ID: 29228139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.
Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics.
Livas C; Pandis N; Ren Y
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25052374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Demographic characteristics of systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials in orthodontic journals with impact factor.
Kanavakis G; Dombroski MM; Malouf DP; Athanasiou AE
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Feb; 38(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 25788332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in orthodontics.
Lempesi E; Koletsi D; Fleming PS; Pandis N
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2014 Jun; 14(2):46-52. PubMed ID: 24913524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reporting completeness of scoping reviews in orthodontic literature up to 2022. An empirical study.
Mikelis F; Koletsi D
Eur J Orthod; 2023 Jul; 45(4):444-449. PubMed ID: 37183724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review.
Strech D; Soltmann B; Weikert B; Bauer M; Pfennig A
J Clin Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1214-21. PubMed ID: 21294992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does journal endorsement of reporting guidelines influence the completeness of reporting of health research? A systematic review protocol.
Shamseer L; Stevens A; Skidmore B; Turner L; Altman DG; Hirst A; Hoey J; Palepu A; Simera I; Schulz K; Moher D
Syst Rev; 2012 May; 1():24. PubMed ID: 22626029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
