These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30954395)

  • 1. Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyıldız S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Oct; 63(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 30954395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
    Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trueness and precision of mandibular complete-arch implant scans when different data acquisition methods are used.
    Demirel M; Donmez MB; Şahmalı SM
    J Dent; 2023 Nov; 138():104700. PubMed ID: 37714451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the accuracy of extraoral laboratory scanners with a single-tooth abutment model: A 3D analysis.
    Mandelli F; Gherlone E; Gastaldi G; Ferrari M
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Oct; 61(4):363-370. PubMed ID: 27771189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
    Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
    J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies.
    González de Villaumbrosia P; Martínez-Rus F; García-Orejas A; Salido MP; Pradíes G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):543-550.e1. PubMed ID: 27112413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
    Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
    Emir F; Ayyildiz S
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scanning accuracy of nondental structured light extraoral scanners compared with that of a dental-specific scanner.
    Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Jiménez-Martínez MJ; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):110-114. PubMed ID: 32665118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy.
    Borbola D; Berkei G; Simon B; Romanszky L; Sersli G; DeFee M; Renne W; Mangano F; Vag J
    J Dent; 2023 Feb; 129():104391. PubMed ID: 36549570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
    Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners.
    Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.
    Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners.
    Dutton E; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Culp A; Kessler R; Renne W
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Mar; 32(2):204-218. PubMed ID: 31568660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of trueness and precision of two intraoral scanners and a conventional impression: an in vivo clinical study.
    Jorquera GJ; Sampaio CS; Bozzalla A; Hirata R; Sánchez JP
    Quintessence Int; 2021 Oct; 52(10):904-910. PubMed ID: 34410071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
    Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan.
    Park GH; Son K; Lee KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 30598314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.